dude, how can you say Delhi,1984 and Gujrat,2002 were different. Both were organized killing/looting of people of a cast with police and judiciary overlooking the proceedings. Bombay 1992-3 was a different case though. If current Congress gov is guilty so is Gujrat gov.
Its amazing how u go till Germany but forget ur own backyard...
Another Hindu Nationalist speaking with half true facts and selective presentation of data. Ofcourse, the view point is right, that Sikhs are more less cowardice than others ( especially among INDIANS) and have been at the forefront of struggle. Also, they have been given a bad treatment in 1984 riots, but the data supporting it is flawed and is tinged with saffron colors. Rediff.com is sure to lose credibility if it keeps publishing such articles. Is REDIFF.COM a mouthpiece of Hindu Nationalism????
RE:Another Hindu Nationalist
by Dev on Sep 06, 2005 12:05 PM Permalink
oops, it seems, the writer stepped over this guys' tail and left him in pain. i support rediff.com and rajeev srinivasan from the bottom of my heart. Well done Rajeev
Bark of Anti- Hindu Nationalists
by Kannan on Aug 23, 2005 06:58 PM Permalink
If Rajeev and Rediff.com are branded to represent Hindu nationalism, isnt it logical to brand those who are against them as Anti-hindu nationalists? Our media has always shied away from real facts. Moplah revolt is showed as a class struggle ,when it was the genocide against the hindus. What's happening in Kannur in Kerala is the Marxist genocide of hindus while in Kottayam and wayanad districts of kerala , it's the Christian terrorism on poor tribals after looting their lands and planting crosses everywehere. But will our media ever expose them? When media(esp the minority controlled ones) accuses Guj govt., they cleverly forget the burning of innocent women and children by terrorists. Because who cares for hindus in an era of apartheid against hindus(in their own homeland) and their institutions?
