Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 28 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Your argument is false
by Amit Shesh on Aug 11, 2005 10:53 PM  Permalink 

I disagree with your argument that the Indian media or the human rights activists in India did not raise a voice against the unjust editorial and the Brazilian shooting, so they are hypocritical and don't care. According to your analogy, every person giving alms to some beggar is hypocritical because he is not giving alms to all the beggars that exist! That was a potshot taken at the Human rights activists that was really uncalled for.

Though I agree with the basic premise of the article, the author is a little too inflammatory and is just generalizing unnecessarily. Let's call a spade a spade, but let's not call all cards spades! "beating white men to death", "street fights", "preying on white women", etc. is too much. Surely you don't mean that the apparent ethnic cleansing is going on so obviously that you know about it, but the British police isn't doing anything about them! We all know Britain has always been a Muslim appeaser and has always shielded terrorists, but let's not lose sight of rationale and logic before commenting on the situation. The article sounds like a Sunny Deol movie. :-)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Britain woke up on 7/7
by VSL Narasimham on Aug 11, 2005 09:50 PM  Permalink 

Asian and African lives are cheaper than Anglo-Saxon lives. Thousands of innocents died and are still dying in India because of terrorism and western countries prescribe us dialogue and human rights....when it happens in any western country, they have this unquestioned right to invade countries and kill thousands of civilians, all in the name of safeguarding "FREE" societies....It's time someone stood up to challenge them on this....we see no such fantasy when all one hears are the magic words "defence partnerships","Global Strategic Partnerships" etc.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
An extremist analysis
by samarsena on Aug 11, 2005 06:43 PM  Permalink 

This is an 'extremist' analysis forcefully presenting a biased opinion based on selected material.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
He is abs. right
by shanthi on Aug 11, 2005 06:20 PM  Permalink 

Blunt enough.. frank FACTS!! All the world (US, UK)
poured help into Pakistan..while India was pointing an accusing finger at Pakis.

What about Bombay blasts., Coimbatore blasts ??
Who cared then??. Now they feel the pinch..

But i also feel that only these countries can
deal with the terror this fanaticism is posing.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Britons woke up on 7/7
by Richard Lewis on Aug 11, 2005 06:12 PM  Permalink 

Mr. Srinivasan it was a brilliant article and you are absolutely right that Britons woke up on 7/7 but would they ever realize how India has been coping up with the terrorist activities from neighbouring country all these years.

According to my knowledge, Britons and Americans have been supporting & protecting terrorists (LTTE, Khalistan Movement, Pakistanis etc.) all these years and they are responsible for spread of terrorism in the world. Now that they got the pinch for breeding terrorists in their own country. It is high time that they stop protecting the terrorists and change their veiws towards victim countries.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Terrorists target countries not religions
by HJ on Aug 11, 2005 05:58 PM  Permalink 

Yes your article does touch on the point of the human rights issue and the western view on the same. But to say that terrorists target mainly Hindus in India is going a bit too far. Their mission is to weaken INDIAN resolve on the Kashmir issue and not to target a certain religion in our country. These terrorists are happy killing civilians with total disregard to their religion, as long as they kill INDIANS.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ISI hand in jul 21 bombings
by ranjit roy on Aug 11, 2005 05:49 PM  Permalink 

In your article you have stated that there was an ISI hand in the failed Jul 21 bombings (where all 4 attempts failed) - Is this conjecture or based on factual findings?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 28 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message