RE:India Persia connections
by RAJESH CHAUDHARI on Apr 25, 2008 05:11 PM Permalink
NANCHIL, STOP BEHAVING LIKE AN OVER GROWN KID. IF YOU HAVE AN OPINION TO SHARE YOU CAN DO SO BY REFRAINING FROM RIDICULING MY COUNTRY, WHICH I AM SURE CANNOT BE YOURS.I AM SURPRISED THAT NO ONE ON THIS FORUM HAS ANYTHING TO SAY TO THIS WEIRDO.I AM NO FOREIGN POLICY EXPERT, BUT CANNOT TOLERATE SUCH MISGIVINGS FROM ZOMBIES.
RE:India Persia connections
by A Singh on Apr 25, 2008 05:26 PM Permalink
There is ome element of truth in what you say. But I think, when our leaders talk about historic links between India and Persia, they do not mean the links before advent of Islam, as the official historians would tell you, India did not exist before Alexander decided to invade it. Perhaps the leaders mean that Persians have historically been bytchering Indians, and therefore, we share a historical link. Your anger can be understood, but it puts you in a very poor light. You have exposed yourself as an emotional fool; one of countless such, who contribute towards India being a stupid nation. It has always been the endeavour of our leaders, to gain recognition as a genuine sympathiser of Islam, and nobody is an exception here. Atal Bihari Vajpai was perhaps the greatest believer in the myth that by bowing to Islam and Islamic country, India could be spared the ordeal of going through the 'historic' masacres once again. Anyway, people like you are also required. Keep it up.
RE:RE:India Persia connections
by leonard on Apr 26, 2008 01:39 AM Permalink
Singh, history has taught that a country has to devise ways to defend itself. India, for whatever reason has only one example of successful defence in recent history, that of Porus's defeat of Alexander at Hyderpas. If you can't defend yourself ABC or D will invade you. If the Persians did'nt do it someone else would have
if u watch carefully iran president has a resemblance of US president Geroge Bush.....
In Ind even a beggar fm foreign country is given red carpet welcome by the congress party. Iran being a threat to world nation, ind shud show some sort of protest towards him as there is greater risk of nuclear weapons being exchanged to the the terrorist groups thru Iran.. The tendency of V Indians is that v dont think ahead of time...
RE:sdf
by JNB on Apr 25, 2008 05:07 PM Permalink
All oil producing countries who have good business relation with US are very good, those who have not they are threat to the world...(the world and the US are now the same)
we are missing a lot in between lines here!!!!are we not all fooled into thinking that the PROFESSIONAL west really care about wat a president from a third world country thinks of it????absolutely if not for the oil!!!
RE:Why the hell would the west care about ahmednijad????
by Guest on Jun 08, 2008 04:18 PM Permalink
Why the hell would the west care about ahmednijad????
Because Muslim are blind towards ahmednijad, and are terrorist compare to other religion so I don't agree that Islam is the most rapidly growing and accepted religion in US which US wants to stop.
Then why America is after Iran?
USA is after Iran because US wants to capture oil supply as american are nationalist
RE:RE:Why the hell would the west care about ahmednijad????
by dipti regmi on Apr 26, 2008 04:26 PM Permalink
Because Islam is the most rapidly growing and accepted religion in US. which US wants to stop.
RE:Why the hell would the west care about ahmednijad????
by onlooker on Apr 27, 2008 05:34 PM Permalink
Growing for u means GROWING in numbers....even if one accepts that Sri-Sri ravishankar types are spritual businessmen...HOW MANY OF SUCH have ISLAM produced...and are ACCCEPTED WORLD OVER??....they atleast strive for INNER-PEACE...understand the power of HINDUISM baby!!!
RE:RE:RE:RE:Why the hell would the west care about ahmednijad????
by Guest on Jun 08, 2008 04:19 PM Permalink
Why the hell would the west care about ahmednijad???? Because Muslim are blind towards ahmednijad, and are terrorist compare to other religion so I don't agree that Islam is the most rapidly growing and accepted religion in US which US wants to stop.
Then why America is after Iran?
USA is after Iran because US wants to capture oil supply
The west may be hating the Iran's president but is willing to do business with him if it gives them profits!The russia is already selling Nuclear Plants to Iran!This irks US but instead of asking Russia not to do so is thretening Iran!The France too is very much intersted in trade with Iran !"Iran is France's primary trade partner in Mideast, French minister Friday, 15 October 2004 IRNA
Paris - French Foreign Trade Minister Francois Loos said in Paris on Thursday that Iran ranks first among France Trade partners in the Middle East.
Speaking at a seminar on "Foreign Investment Prospect in Iran", he said that the reforms made on foreign investment policy in Iran and the country's suitable investment atmosphere have paved the ground for expansion of bilateral trade relations.
On Iran's peaceful nuclear program and nuclear case pending at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), he added "France's policy has always been to prevent proliferation of nuclear weapons expansion of industrial and scientific expansion with Tehran."
RE:Earnestly speaking
by aruna on Apr 25, 2008 03:18 PM Permalink
He is right or wrong talk about that.He can say things to USA that we can not say does not mean he is a great man.If he can question the genocide of yahoodis in Hitler's era he will certainly doubt killings of Kashmiri Hindus at the hands of Jehadis.Any person doubting the existance of Israel should first condom making of Pakistan (and particularly so if the person is a muslim).I do'nt like praise of a person who being a leader of masses do'nt talk absolute humanism. aruna
RE:Earnestly speaking
by aruna on Apr 25, 2008 03:19 PM Permalink
He is right or wrong talk about that.He can say things to USA that we can not say does not mean he is a great man.If he can question the genocide of yahoodis in Hitler's era he will certainly doubt killings of Kashmiri Hindus at the hands of Jehadis.Any person doubting the existance of Israel should first condom making of Pakistan (and particularly so if the person is a muslim).I do'nt like praise of a person who being a leader of masses do'nt talk absolute humanism. aruna
RE:Earnestly speaking
by on Apr 25, 2008 04:33 PM Permalink
Babar,did your mother have use of condom? You paki muslim.... How dare you abuse a Hindu lady?
RE:RE:Earnestly speaking
by ChamanLal Koul on Apr 25, 2008 04:31 PM Permalink
Aruna you live in a wonderland and arugue without knowledge or reason.First scratch the history and then speak.you need a lot of homeowrk to do.further about the massacre of kashmiri pandits everything is not attributed to jehadis but gov of india and army is also equally responsible rather there have been more atrocities on muslims by army which is never highlighted."truth in kahsmir is truth never comes out"
RE:Earnestly speaking
by PARAMVIR SAWHNEY on Apr 25, 2008 04:58 PM Permalink
Chaman Lal kaul Mujhe tere naam par shak hai.Muslims do not tolerate Hindus.Whether in Pakistan,Bangladesh or Afghanistan.See the population of Hindus in these countries.Hardly 5%.
RE:Earnestly speaking
by aruna on Apr 25, 2008 04:29 PM Permalink
dear sir history is same for both;one is convinient to you another is not.you want tolerance from others but when it is expected of you....history has many examples of zero-tolerance for others... latest is taliban.what happened in Bamiyaan.those Buddha statues were not made by any outsider people living there might have made them;where are those people..answer is ethnic cleansing..history will open many wounds.learn lesson from it because its repeation may start from other side. aruna
RE:Earnestly speaking
by Turabe Fazil on Apr 25, 2008 06:04 PM Permalink
Dear Aruna I never said we are intolerant...u see your own script and mine...u will understand the difference...The thing is believing in the information which is brought to you withuot adressing its merits.Cultural differences had been there right through out and hence do i believe that human race is not sophisticated enough par its excellence in COMMUNICATION.The race for survival was on from times unkown, what hurts is in the process we are forgetting to live though we have enough surplous to feed all the millions!!!!ONLY GOD CAN SAVE SUCH A RACE!!!
