RE:Accept the truth
by bobby on Apr 08, 2008 03:20 PM Permalink
Thanx for describing all person from uttar pradesh as illitarate .Do u know laralappa that uttar pradesh had given 7 primeminsiters to modern india, it is uttar pradesh from where all high profile post people are representing our country & states, all major industrialist have base in uttar pardesh, it is our generisity that we had developed your house first.You talk about languages used by us shows that we are criminals, than what will u describe attack on helpless labourer by your brave Raj Party mens ,IS that not goondiasam, why u all dont dare to ask sachin,gavaskar,ravishastri, lata mangeskar, nan patekar, sharad pawar & last but most important your bal/raj thackery, to contribute in development of mumbai or maharastra.Look amitjee is in mumbai because film industry is in mumbai & mumbai is mumbai because of this film industry,stock market & plz laralapa if by chance government takes decision to remove this two offices from mumbai not only ur framers but even people living in cities will have no option but suicide.Your ministers had done nothing for mumbai its people from north india who had setteled in mumbai had done so much for mumbai, so please keep cool & think rightl before its too late for you all because if entire noth indians take the decision to vacate your state you all will cruise & search the head of your thackery. JAI HIND MERA BHARAT MAHAN.
RE:RE:Accept the truth
by Ann Pan on Apr 08, 2008 03:26 PM Permalink
Hey Bobby, these eccentric pro Thakareys will not understand. Remember how they beat people for celebrating valentines etc and the anti muslim and anti Christian activities. They think it is being educated so be it.
RE:Accept the truth
by raman on Apr 08, 2008 03:18 PM Permalink
oh yes definitely marathis r superior!! u can see that by the way women r molested by dozens of men on new years eve who r well educated and have good std of living!!yup...marathi pride n superiority is clearly shown in this example :D
RE:Accept the truth
by Peaceful Protest on Apr 08, 2008 03:11 PM Permalink
Yes, and first educate your own CM Mayawati about retail stores such as Reliance etc. First bring Bihar and UP to this century then speak about Maharashtra.
Personally I think there cannot be a comparison between the 2 of them they are world apart one is the Dump and the other is ((it takes a lot of effort) greatly respected. Its only the fools and people who have nothing to do and want to get cheap publicity. I think Media should just shun these kind of persons who cannot do good for our country and only bequeath Harm and Agony.Which the Poor and Middle class pay for and are punished, come elections and the people should vote for the Mr.Or Ms Right who will do good for the people.
The comparison between Rajanikanth and Amitabh is not fair. Amitabh Bachchan is not a famous and popular actor because he works in Marathi films. Rajanikanth is famous because of Tamil films. So if Rajani shows his allegiance to Tamilnadu, he may be right but Amitabh has no such compulsion to show allegiance to Marathi or Maharashtra.
RE:Amitabh Bachchan is not made famous by Marathi films
by umesh patil on Apr 08, 2008 03:13 PM Permalink
it is not related with the issue of in which industry he has working
RE:Amitabh Bachchan is not made famous by Marathi films
by amit saxena on Apr 08, 2008 03:15 PM Permalink
We should think of what he is doing for India(through movies which is his field not social work).Compare rajanikanth and Amitabh in hindi movies in which he also worked.Rajanikanth is not thinking of nation.Who knows Rajanikanth in World.Amitabh is known in world.He made a special place of Bollywood internationally.
RE:Amitabh Bachchan is not made famous by Marathi films
by bharat on Apr 08, 2008 03:16 PM Permalink
If Amitabh had stayed in Allahabad, would he have become what he is now, despite all his talent? Mumbai/Maharashtra, as his 'karmabhoomi' has played a lion's role in his gaining all his fame and money and it is his moral obligation to repay his karmabhoomi has given him, even if he may not have made money from Marathi films!
RE:Amitabh Bachchan is not made famous by Marathi films
by aoneall on Apr 08, 2008 03:33 PM Permalink
I already told you not to equate Mumbai with Maharashtra. Both are different things.
RE:Amitabh Bachchan is not made famous by Marathi films
by JNB on Apr 08, 2008 03:12 PM Permalink
Precisely!! Rajanikanth earns money from Tamil people. But Amitabh Bachchan and his movies earn money from all over India.
RE:Can Amitabh
by Raman D J on Apr 08, 2008 03:11 PM Permalink
what an idiotic question. He has done sufficient for India and my friend, I hope you realise, India is bigger than Mumbai or Maharashtra.
RE:Can Amitabh
by Ajay Mishra on Apr 08, 2008 03:17 PM Permalink
Mr Paranjape, Can u list what other Maharshtrian actors have done for Mumbai. U will be surprised when the movie "Shwas" was ready to go to Oscar and they fell short of finance Mr Bachchan gave the amount to the producers of the movie and the movie proceeded for Oscar. At that instant none of the Marathi actors came or even the politician came to give the amount. The bottom line is: Every so called Neta just want to earn money and nothing else and thrash pooor people who work hard to earn their livelihood.
RE:Can Amitabh
by Ann Pan on Apr 08, 2008 03:13 PM Permalink
Can u tell me one thing you have dome for Maharashtra as a Maharashtrian first Mr Paranjape?
RE:Can Amitabh
by Siddharth Solanki on Apr 08, 2008 03:13 PM Permalink
mr paranjpe....grow out of this stupid mentality...will be good for you..poisoned minds are worse that nuclear weapons
RE:RE:Can Amitabh
by Madan Kumar on Apr 08, 2008 03:21 PM Permalink
so sidhi babu - you are not capable to answer his question. then keep quet tht will better for you.
RE:Can Amitabh
by K.A.Kuttaiah on Apr 08, 2008 03:15 PM Permalink
His very presence has created numerous jobs for the industry and of course for Mumbaikers
RE:Can Amitabh
by bobby on Apr 08, 2008 03:22 PM Permalink
can u tell us something what sachin,gavaskar,ravi shastri, bal/raj thackery had done for mumbai.agreed amitjee had done nothing for mumbai but did ur own did?
RE:Can Amitabh
by Deepak Trivedi on Apr 08, 2008 03:41 PM Permalink
Mr. Pranjpae ko phool bhejo, he is seriously unwell. Now coming to the point, throw the actor families out of Mumbai. Not one but all who are North Indians or from South. See wht is left out!!
RE:Can Amitabh
by aoneall on Apr 08, 2008 03:09 PM Permalink
No law of the land requires him to do any thing for Mumbai. Who are you to ask such a question?
RE:RE:Can Amitabh
by Raman D J on Apr 08, 2008 03:13 PM Permalink
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. hohohohohohohohoho.... what a stupid reply
RE:Can Amitabh
by bharat on Apr 08, 2008 03:13 PM Permalink
No one is talking about the law of the land. Its about moral obligation!
If Amitabh had stayed in Allahabad, would he have become what he is now, despite all his talent? Mumbai has played a lion's role in his gaining all his fame and money and it is his moral obligation to repay what Mumbai has given him, even if he may not have made money from Marathi films!
RE:RE:Can Amitabh
by Ann Pan on Apr 08, 2008 03:14 PM Permalink
Yes he would have made a name anywhere in the country because he worked hard for it, Mr Bharat.
RE:Can Amitabh
by bharat on Apr 08, 2008 03:20 PM Permalink
Facts tell that Mumbai has been key in most of the Hindi film actors, including Amitabh getting successful. Otherwise why would a big big majority of actors choose to make Mumbai as their home? Why did Hindi film industry not take roots in the Hindi heartland instead of in Maharashtra?
RE:Can Amitabh
by aoneall on Apr 08, 2008 03:30 PM Permalink
Hindi film industry made Mumbai its home in Mumbai and not in Maharashtra. Do I need to remind you that Mumbai Presedency was there when no such thing as Maharashtra existed.
RE:RE:Can Amitabh
by Siddharth Solanki on Apr 08, 2008 03:15 PM Permalink
raj thackeray has only instigated mobs and led to more damage of public and state property..this is what he has done for the state...
RE:Can Amitabh
by Roni gavaskar on Apr 08, 2008 03:12 PM Permalink
1. Huge TAX contribution..! 2. International Staus 3. Not just Mumbai..HE represents whole India Internationally. 4. Kargil WAR contribution 5. Highest quality ENTERTAINMENT in India Film Industry 6. EMPLOYEMENT to Mumnaiakers in his own company 7. EYE Donation for self and family 8. Etc Etc Etc..He is still capable of making HUGE CONTRIBUTIONS.
RE:Can Amitabh
by Madan Kumar on Apr 08, 2008 03:16 PM Permalink
Nothing is correct. All total wrong r gavaskar - your name itself is wrong then how yo u can make any correct statement. keep quet or.....
RE:RE:Can Amitabh
by Madan Kumar on Apr 08, 2008 03:17 PM Permalink
Nothing is correct. All total wrong r gavaskar - your name itself is wrong then how yo u can make any correct statement. keep quet or.....
RE:RE:Dont Make Maharastra to Bihar/Up
by aoneall on Apr 08, 2008 03:11 PM Permalink
Do not act as if you own Mumbai. Any advice from people like you is irrelevent.
RE:Dont Make Maharastra to Bihar/Up
by ranjan pradhan on Apr 08, 2008 03:20 PM Permalink
People of Bihar & UP'S are more cultured and well manner then Maharathi Manoosh
India has lot of poverty. If anybody is doing good work for other (may be for his own state) no issue. 99% of indian are not doing good work for other. Atleast BIG B is doing for his own state. Has anybody done any good work for other ?? If not, why are we stopping other (BIG B) ??
RE:Kick out Bangladeshis
by Sahadeven KK on Apr 08, 2008 03:08 PM Permalink
Pls. leave the poor Bangladeshis alone. They are an asset to India. Come election time, they vote en block for the best party in India - CPM!
