Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 1296 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
migration of a family
by sarla on Apr 08, 2008 03:45 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Africa to sindh
Sindh to varanasi
Varanasi to maharashtra
Maharashtra to bandra, Bombay
Then occupied flats and mill land by beating and killing marathis like ramesh kinis.
Went on accumulating wealth by harashing Indian citizens.
Purchased one house but claim whole Mumbai and maharashtra as theirs because their fathers migrated here earlier and rest are coming late.
LATE COMERS ARE OUTSIDERS.
By same logic Tomorrow America will claim Moon as their land because they saw it first.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:migration of a family
by sarla on Apr 08, 2008 03:54 PM  Permalink
time to send raj thakre back to africa. So that Indians could progress in peace.

SON OF SOIL POLICY AT INDIAN LEVEL MEANS INDIAN SOIL AND INDIANS SONS.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:migration of a family
by Amit on Apr 08, 2008 04:05 PM  Permalink
And you too there.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:migration of a family
by heramb gude on Apr 08, 2008 03:48 PM  Permalink
Ramesh Kini is originally from Karnataka and not a Marathi manoos as you r falsely propagating here.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:migration of a family
by Amit on Apr 08, 2008 04:03 PM  Permalink
Dear do you know that name of our City is Mumbai and not Bombay?
You are still under British rule, sorry Italian Rule.
Shame on you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:migration of a family
by Jayaprakash AV on Apr 08, 2008 03:52 PM  Permalink
Absolutely correct !!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:migration of a family
by Jayaprakash AV on Apr 08, 2008 03:52 PM  Permalink
Absolutely correct !!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
We neither take side of Raj nor Amitabh
by Peaceful Protest on Apr 08, 2008 03:44 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

But the danger posed by UP and Bihari criminals to Mumbai is real.

It is a threat to not only Marathis but to all non-marathis in Mumbai.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:We neither take side of Raj nor Amitabh
by Deepak Trivedi on Apr 08, 2008 03:46 PM  Permalink
You know who hires these UP and Bihari criminals. Your own Guys. Jaago Mamu. bahar niklo apne dadbe mein se.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:We neither take side of Raj nor Amitabh
by Amit on Apr 08, 2008 04:07 PM  Permalink
Local Congress leaders in Mumbai.They r the people who hire people like you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:We neither take side of Raj nor Amitabh
by suvo sarkar on Apr 08, 2008 03:54 PM  Permalink
These Biharis are only fooling everyone, by earning in other states(than Bihar) and sending and circulating their possessions in Bihar. All Biharis are looting the World .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
LOOSER Maharasthra VS AMITABH BACHCHAN
by atanu on Apr 08, 2008 03:44 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Marthis said Bachchan did nothing for him. They forgot the huge taxes,profits and employment generation that Baccchan did through his films. Now isn't it a bit shamelessness?

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:LOOSER Maharasthra VS AMITABH BACHCHAN
by Peaceful Protest on Apr 08, 2008 03:45 PM  Permalink
paan thikse thookna sikh le bhaiyye


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:LOOSER Maharasthra VS AMITABH BACHCHAN
by atanu on Apr 08, 2008 03:47 PM  Permalink
Thuk diya. Kahape maat puch

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Question?
by bharat on Apr 08, 2008 03:43 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Would Tamil Nadu had given Rajnikant the same fame, respect if he had stayed in Tamil Nadu and acted in non Tamil films only?

On the other hand, look that the fame and respect that Maharashtra has given to Amitabh inspite of his having done nothing for the state which has played a significant role in making him what he is. As Amitabh had himself said once, if he had not made it to the film industry, he would have been selling milk in Allahabad.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Question?
by R Swaminathan on Apr 08, 2008 04:01 PM  Permalink
Dear bharat
please have an attitude in tune with your name.in india we have people of different linguistis/religious group settling in another state and they have contributed and prospered there.
During the maratha rule large no.of marathis came and settled in tamilnadu known as 'raoji's' and they are well respected and part and parcel of the tamil community.many gujarati's known as surashtra's have settled in madurai for ages and some of the famous tamil figures hail from that community.
do you know that there is an tamil iyengar settlement in remote west- bengal village called 'BERO' and they are as much part of west bengal as any other bengali.
to create differences among indians when we are so closely interlinked is criminal and anti national.
Amithabh Bachan is a true representative of our national spirit-father -U.P,mother punjabi,wife-bengali,daughter-in-law-from karnatak.
can u find a better image of a true indian spirit?
we should celeberate and encourage people to migrate and intermingle and intermarry as veer savarkar(a maharashtian)had said.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Question?
by kartik shashikant shingala on Apr 08, 2008 03:47 PM  Permalink
What have you done?

1. Huge TAX contribution..!
2. Brought International Status to India with dignity.
3. Not just Mumbai..HE represents whole India Internationally.
4. Kargil WAR contribution
5. Highest quality ENTERTAINMENT (Acting & Singing) in Indian Film Industry & for ALL INDIANS
6. EMPLOYEMENT to Mumnaiakers in his own company
7. EYE Donation for self and family
8. PADMAM Shree & Padam VIBHSHAN Awards
9. Huge Latur EARTH Qual Relief contribution
10. Tsunami Contribution by the whole family
11. BEST Hindi dialouge speech - Contributing in keeping genuine HINDI alive.
12. Support donation mobilisation for Mumbai train Blast victims
13. His CHARACTER and MANNERISM is Inspirational for all Young & Old INDIANS.
14. WELL KNOWN Figure amoung 1/3 population on earth - he belongs to Mumbai.
15. Etc Etc Etc..He is still capable of making HUGE CONTRIBUTIONS at this age.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Raj is a Maharashtrian & not an Indian
by Avtar Kaul on Apr 08, 2008 03:43 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Raj is a negative thinker who is damaging the cause of Maharashtra. Though I know Maharashtra is bigger than Rashtra in the true sense of the term, yet I feel Raj is making a joke of that term.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Raj is a Maharashtrian & not an Indian
by SLVP on Apr 08, 2008 03:44 PM  Permalink
Yes its true he is fighting for a real problem.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
This article was published by REDIFF ENTERTAIN BUREAU
by SLVP on Apr 08, 2008 03:42 PM  Permalink 

Yes That was good ENTERTAINMENT.
Keep on entertaining .....

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:LOOSER Maharasthra VS AMITABH BACHCHAN
by SLVP on Apr 08, 2008 03:43 PM  Permalink
are u his PA ?????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:LOOSER Maharasthra VS AMITABH BACHCHAN
by kumar on Apr 08, 2008 03:43 PM  Permalink
who is feeding u

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:LOOSER Maharasthra VS AMITABH BACHCHAN
by Peaceful Protest on Apr 08, 2008 03:43 PM  Permalink
paan thikse thookna sikh le bhaiyye


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 1296 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
Write a message