RE:what is this???
by Bolly Woods on Nov 22, 2007 10:10 AM Permalink
No, I didn't get enough time to sleep. Very perceptive of you to have found that out.
I simply don%u2019t understand what you write%u2026..
Your article %u2026%u2026always.. I mean always%u2026. Get on my nerves%u2026
For example:
%u201CAgree or disagree, as you will (speaking for myself, I don't) %u2013%u201C
What does this mean:
You don%u2019t agree? you don%u2019t disagree? You don%u2019t care whether you agree or disagree? It means nothing. It is M.F Hussein%u2019s art. It means whatever reader interprets it to be.
I have a suggestion:
Please include a poll at the end of each article:
Did u read it? a) yes
b) No
Did u understand? a) yes
b) no
I am sending you a result that I go after sending your article as an attachment to 100 people ( to my conpany%u2019s distri-list) with the above 2 questions:
1A %u2013 42%
1B %u201358%
2A %u20132%
2B %u201398%
When I contacted 2% people who nodded in response to question 2, NONE of them could comprehend what they understood%u2026..all of them were CAT aspirants and believed that every piece of writing makes sense; they can understand anything on this planet; what you write is good English and can be expected in CAT paper; they MUST understand everything that does not make sense.
RE:mail to the writer
by Bolly Woods on Nov 22, 2007 10:12 AM Permalink
I am very obliged to you for taking all that trouble. If the words (speaking for myself, I don't) does not tell you that I do not agree, I despair of your understanding. People who do understand, and have thoughts to share in response, email me -- and judged by the number of emails, plenty do. So if I was you, I wouldn't worry so much.
RE:mail to the writer
by renish nair on Nov 21, 2007 09:42 PM Permalink
"Agree or disagree, as you will (speaking for myself, I don't)" its upto the reader to agree or disagree.. bolly disagrees with karan's views.
think now adays critics r not being truthful. all just go for money. i agree to one of tyhe above comment that OSO wasa disaster. it was nothing but just a heap of overacting wid no proper story. instaed i loved the movie sawaariya which is just put down by the critics so badly. i belive some critics just dont watch the movie n report accourding to the stars or are they given money to write it down. anyways i feel people should go by their instinct and not by other people's writings
RE:critics doesnt deserve to criticise
by rohan kulkarni on Nov 21, 2007 09:39 PM Permalink
seroiusly........well i guess u critics have redeemed urself a bit thru this article.......but u continue to be fed by srk's money...........that remains a fact........no problem....anyway SAAWARIYA was a beautiful piece of work............it will surely be appreciated by many....KARAN JOHAR is for once right...
RE:RE:critics doesnt deserve to criticise
by DOVE on Nov 25, 2007 08:31 PM Permalink
saawariya is bad for bhansali's level. but better than oso just becoz it has sincere emotions n freshness. oso is a terrible shit hyped by srk, critics n media.
Critics are money makers these days. All the producers and distributors who pay good amount to the critics get good words from them. Recently I could not stand the movie OSO. What was so different in the movie, it was all rubbish masala but just due to hype and advertisement the movie worked. I heard nobody saying me personally that they loved the movie OSO. Critics these days should be banned from writing or limitation shall be drawn of who shall be a critic.
The Bollywood should look at south films, because they have great script writters, story makers, and great directors. bollywood should learn how to make films which attract people. like Priyadarshan he remakes his own old films to hindi. Is it not tell us a great potential story of south cienema. atleast remake malayalam films, we can save our industry.
RE:RE:Kolywood is batter than other !
by geet kandya on Nov 21, 2007 08:10 PM Permalink
yandada rascala.........naught pussi........yandada rascala.......MIND IT...!!!...........is this whats ur cinema???
RE:Kolywood is batter than other !
by manikantan k on Nov 22, 2007 06:16 AM Permalink
This is what u call IGNORANCE....GEET Blah Blah(Whatever ur name is) see movies of south and then comment... what SRK did was just a comic piece but U SEEM TO NOT UNDERSTAND THE JOKE !! Joker !!
RE:Kolywood is batter than other !
by geet kandya on Nov 22, 2007 12:35 PM Permalink
haan,rite.............what rajnikanth does with cigrattes n all,,,,,,,sivaji etc....i've all seen.........what a shit.......u guys shud learn something from ur own superstar, rajnikanth........try being humble and realistic...........even he accepts that bollywood is much better than south indian stuff.........go get a life...!!!
The Bollywood should look at south films, because they have great script writters, story makers, and great directors. bollywood should learn how to make films which attract people. like Priyadarshan he remakes his own old films to hindi. Is it not tell us a great potential story of south cienema. atleast remake malayalam films, we can save our industry.
The Bollywood should look at south films, because they have great script writters, story makers, and great directors. bollywood should learn how to make films which attract people. like Priyadarshan he remakes his own old films to hindi. Is it not tell us a great potential story of south cienema. atleast remake malayalam films, we can save our industry.
