RE:Shrek the third..
by The Moderator on Jun 01, 2007 09:48 PM Permalink
kaka... good one........ for all those who do not know what 'turd' means go to www.dictionary.com and find out
"This third installment in the Shrek saga, which has grossed nearly $1.3 billion worldwide and some $1 billion in ancillary sales including DVD, was directed by Chris Miller." - "As for Shrek, it could open to smaller numbers compared to those achieved by Spider-Man 3. The ogre film too could make big waves across the globe. But the big question is whether it will overtake its predecessors, which grossed $920 million worldwide."
What do those two sentences mean by? First one says the Shrek Saga has grossed $1.2 bn and the last statement says whether the third movie can corss 920 million dollars.
How many people wrote this review? Why does not Rediff quality check before publishing? Of course, this information on how much Shrek has grossed is not very important at all, but it irritates when reading an article (review) like this.
RE:How many wrote this review?
by Thierry Henry on May 21, 2007 09:02 AM Permalink
If you notice carefully.... It says the SHREK SAGA (the entire series) that has made $1.3 billion. So perhaps you should blame your intellect and comprehension a bit rather than criticizing the Rediff staff!
RE:How many wrote this review?
by Uber Bored on Jun 01, 2007 01:18 PM Permalink
Monsieur Henry....
Ananth is quite right in what he said.. The entire series without including the latest one, consists of Shrek and Shrek 2 - which are 'predecessors' to Shrek the Third. So if the entire series has grossed 1.3B then how come the predecessors grossed only 900m??
RE:RE:How many wrote this review?
by shaini v on Jun 01, 2007 01:18 PM Permalink
Key words to note here - "Shrek Saga" and "Predecessors". And yes Mr Ananth - it means that there is speculation that the "Last Installment of the Shrek Saga" may/may not overtake its "Predecessors" with regards to the money it may bring in...SIMPLE
I think Arthur J Pais was drunk while watching the movie. Shrek3 is a drab. Too many characters (osme fo them are weird such as talking trees). Whatever fun is, that's in teh beginning 15 minutes. After it is boring and nonsense. Shame on rediff for publishing the review becuase its English movie.White man is my master attitude is still there.
RE:Shrek3 is a drab!
by Thierry Henry on May 21, 2007 08:59 AM Permalink
Well buddy! It's not white that matters here...it's green.... The green ogre ;-)
what a stupid review . writing the story of the film to spoil our fun .. such people with no training in film studies but only gossip writing have been constantly encouraged by rediff. sorry.
