RE:wrong spelling
by jophy jose on Jul 01, 2007 08:28 PM Permalink
I guess its McClane only and rediff is right... Mac / Mc prefix are usually found on scottish / irish surnames... and america does contains a lot of scottish and irish settlers....
this has got the action which we never saw in the past like that of car hitting a helicopter or a car in the elevator.those who are excited go and watch it.
Don't we love our action this way. Bruce Willis is simply awesome. It's becoming so hard to find action sequences orchestrated and presented so menacingly beautiful. Die Hard 4.0 truly presents itself as year's best action movie. Awatch Bruce kick some serious ass on the weekend...go for it folks!
I dont get it...i simply dont get it. I have never ever seen a rediff reviewer saying bad about any english movie! and when it comes to indian movies, they start comparing to english flicks and start degrading them!
Come on dude! grow up. I have seen 'Shoot out...' and i simply love that film. Every character was carved so well, that it fitted to the T.
Die hard is an old flick with some new action sequences! I dont get the fact that why is it being taken on such a high note!
No one mentioned 'the last legion' in any review, which starred our very own Aishwarya. It was a good movie, with Ben kingsley, and Colin Firth, and even the young ceasar doing its part to great extent!
Please grow up guys! I have written it million times in other reviews as well!
RE:English vs. Desi movies.
by Karthik Prasad on Jul 01, 2007 02:20 PM Permalink
Dude if you really think the 4 ppl who make indian movies are doing something great then uve got ure bearings wrong. Of course there are good indian movies but comeon you seriously dont think they match die hard 4. the coolness of this movie is the fact that it continues the previous versions so well. its simply awesome man.
RE:English vs. Desi movies.
by Ganesh Ramesh on Jul 02, 2007 01:22 PM Permalink
I totally agree with Mr.Amrit. Mr.Fahad I do also agree with you but to some extent only. Indian movies are good .. but very very few like Mother India or Lagaan ..once in a blue moon. Whereas its the reverse in Hollywood. English movies are bad very rarely. Once in a Blue moon. Those who appreciate good cinema and good technical brilliance will sway toward English movies. No extra makeup , no unnecessary cry baby scenes, no running behind trees or rolling on hills in foeign countries or getting wet under waterfalls and most importantly these movies have no masala. English movies are either completely Comedy or COmpletely Adult or Fully Adventure based. Well categorized and people can watch what they want. Some are fully unbelievable with 100% Special EFX. So those who like those can watch those. Like Matrix , Lord of Rings etc... They dont mix up SENSE WITH NONSENSE...Thats why even I love watching English movies. Before releasing the movie itself MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA categorises it into suitable category and even puts the Age restriction and even says clearly in the certificate if MODERATE VIOLENCE or EXTREME VIOLENCE OR ADULT CONTENT or PARENTAL GUIDANCE is advised. But in Apna Hindi pictures and Indian movies.. so much vulgarity and suddenly in whats called Family movie or categorised by Censor Board as "U" also... so much of sleazy ITEM Nos. and Cleavage show and thunder thighs are seen..Hero breaks into song and kisses heroine's stomach and navel and
RE:English vs. Desi movies.
by amrit singh on Jun 30, 2007 03:32 PM Permalink
buddy..watch Hollywood movies and u will get to know why critics give better reviews abt these
RE:English vs. Desi movies.
by Sandil Srinivasan on Jun 30, 2007 08:00 PM Permalink
You haven't seen the Marine, eh Raja? That's one movie that can revive a film-critic's career any day.
RE:English vs. Desi movies.
by SHREYAS SAXENA on Jul 02, 2007 02:09 PM Permalink
Fahad your point is valid in some cases; definitely not all. One of the reasons we see bias in favour of english movies and against hindi movies is, that only good movies, or movies backed by big production houses come to us. Also, we get to see every hindi movie however it is. There are plenty bad english movies. And they come all the time on HBO or Star. For Hindi movies, another negative is, that very few directors dare to do things differently. Shootout... could have BEEN a great movie, it had a gr8 theme, with a slicker script and direction. Professionalism is missing in most of the movies. Even the EFX that are put in our movies are not that cool, coz they are half-hearted attempts to ape Eng flicks, when we should have done things differently. They look pathetic compared to slick movies from Hollywood, who might not have anything besides cool stunts and EFX. Take Keanu Reaves in "Johnny Mnemonic" for example. Finally, there are some Bollywood producers who are out to make a fast buck by producing totally mindless movies like "Ta Ra Rum Pum" or "Jhoom Barabar Jhoom", which gives Bollywood still further a bad name.
RE:English vs. Desi movies.
by sahl on Jul 02, 2007 01:05 PM Permalink
by the way dude....shootout at lok... was a pathetic movie..with bad direction and songs.so u dont even have a good eye for movies
RE:English vs. Desi movies.
by shaikh aadil on Jul 01, 2007 03:45 PM Permalink
dude... talking about comparisons... try to compare the bollywood super hero Mr. KRISH vs. SPIDER MAN, SUPER MAN, FANTASTIC 4... and the soon to come TRANSFORMERS !!! You already have an answer to your question.
And bollywood... yes it is surely coming of age... but then imagine a movie like DEVDAS being nominated for Oscars... phew... that surely makes me biased towards hollywood anytime :)
RE:English vs. Desi movies.
by Narasimha Raju on Jul 02, 2007 09:54 AM Permalink
by the way!!! for your information Krrish is also copied from hollywood.
The next one will be called "Live Retired or Die Hard-ly" OR "Die Hard 5.0"!!
In the 5th outing, McClane is living happily in a retirement home. One fine day, one of the other inmates grandson decides to make his grandfather pay for not including him in the will and awarding his fortune to an exotic dancer.
The grandson takes over the retirement home and as usual McClane saves the day in his typical style.
There will lot of action in this one too. Wheelchair chases and crashes; flying food trays with easily digestible food; nasty attendants getting their comeuppance, in short the works!!
It will definitely be a great movie and the stunts will stunt your sense of reality even more!!
RE:Next One
by Shraddha Kumbhojkar on Jun 30, 2007 01:52 PM Permalink
Hey Ravi, Bollywood (If not Hollywood!) could do with a brilliant and witty scriptwriter like you! Keep up the good work, you may even get an actual offer for the next Adi Chopra flick:)
Welcome back John Mclane. When i saw the first Die hard i was in my teens, now when i went to see this movie my son was simply stunned by the stunts in the movie. The F-16 shots are fab. and sois the action sequence with Maggie.
It looks like Apoorva didn't understand the dialogue in the movie. It is clearly said by the main villian Gabriel that he wants a F-35 sent after McClane.
Also, a schematic of the plane is shown on the hackers screen with the type of aircraft clearly mentioned!
I guess people who enjoy seeing movies like 'Hum aapke .....' see movies like Die Hard for "dumb" amusement!!
RE:Die harder
by Hakeem Abdul Mohammed on Jun 30, 2007 05:34 PM Permalink
I THINK U MISUNDERSTOOD HIM. HE UNDERSTOOD AND MADE A FUN OF THAT DIALOUGE AND U GOT TRAPPED AS YOU ARE DIE HARD MOVIES LOOKING TYPE AND NOT HUM AAPKE HAIN KOUN ??????
RE:Die harder
by Dubukku Chola on Jun 30, 2007 07:07 PM Permalink
Yeeeeah.. and I liked the tunnel scene as well, turning his car into a weapon! :P Other good one was the hot chick daughter of McClane lol
