rediff editors do know how to make a post popular and divide the country along the lines of state and religion. the shivsena comment was indeed uncalled for. so shame on you rediff, if SS arent doing in any good neither are you. its time say SORRY.
tell this to the politicians who prioritize the ever flowing migrants population to city for vote banks without the thought of providing adequate housing - they go to the slums controlled by slumlords controlled by politicians why does the mumbai airport not get restructured why does the mithi not get unclogged
nothing gets done when zopadpattis (SLUMS)mean vote banks for politicians like Sunil dutts daughter and her assistant baba siddiqui even the rule of law is subverted
They can subsidise the delhi metro by 33000 per traveller but mumbai suburban is worse than a chicken coup this city is dyeing and politicians are to blame
Delhi being our capital, more money is pumped into it to make it look beautiful, cost is immaterial. Secondly, unlike Mumbai, it has the advantage of being land locked, unlike Mumbai, because part of Mumbai is like a finger jutting out into the sea, with no scope of sideways expansion. Mumbai finances Delhi's growth, as do Delhi's neighbouring states.
RE:Mumbaification of Bombay...
by mar gaya on Jul 12, 2008 06:09 PM Permalink
Gaya bihar is a very cultured place compared to Mumbai. Entire bihar was the Karma Bhumi of Lord Buddha and Lord Mahavir. But I would like each ghaatii (all 90 million) to become a Raj Thakrey and start an independence movement like Tilak (Independence is my birthright). Then we northies will say good riddance!
