The data given here in this article clearly states that the growth parameter is in regards to the economical growth. It means the revenue earned by means of Tax & duty & others by the goverment paid by the respective citizen and the corporates. Mumbai is offcourse the economical capital of India but its growth rate per-se last year is less than few other cities. Thats what is mentioned here. Mumbai's or Bangalore's growth rate of 10 is higher than many cities of USA. Does that mean Mumbai or Bangalore is larger & better than those US cities? So please stop mud-slinging here. Every city has its own charm. Look at those and be happy. Mera Bharat Mahan.
RE:Understand the data given here
by Allah on Feb 06, 2008 03:57 PM Permalink
if you talk too much, i will release my favorite prophet on you. Careful !!
RE:Understand the data given here
by Allah on Feb 06, 2008 04:02 PM Permalink
okay lets have a truce, I take the first part of your name, you can take the second. Talah Salah, main hi hoon Allah.
Mumbai(Most rudest City in the world) New epidemics after each mansoon in Mumbai Mumbai gets under water every mansoon People throw people out of train People spread hatred on community lines Progreesive govt cant catch terrorists who bomb them every year indulge in uncivilised public representative like Thakareys People shit on roads.Sometimes shits on railway compartments as well.
Bangalore-Street dogs kill children,Drunkens on public buses.
RE:What progress means
by Allah on Feb 06, 2008 04:07 PM Permalink
"Drunkens on public buses" Dude, you should learn English. Its "Drunkards" not "Drunkens". Dehati Bong
I donot know why burdwan is listed here.I beleive there is no significant industrial growth. Durgapur(near to burdwan) is the industrial hub.However it(Durgapur) has no significant industrial growth.You cannot combine durgapur and burdwan. I think it is a manupulated data.
RE:RE:Is it true
by Chiranjit Sikdar on Feb 07, 2008 10:28 AM Permalink
Hey Mr.....mind ur language man....We, d bengalis are proud tat we r not like u who doesnt know who he is.... come out of id (Infidel Blogger) tat u r using.... let everyone know who u r.....
RE:Is it true
by Chiranjit Sikdar on Feb 07, 2008 10:21 AM Permalink
Probably u r sayin dis because it is ranked higher than kolkata... lets not fight rumi.... lets njoy the fact that even West Bengal has two cities in the top ten list!!!!!
RE:vizag (visakhapatnam) growing fast.. Future capital of Andhra !! one of the beautiful city i have ever seen..GO and see the devlopement of VIZAG .it is better than SURAT
by Ankit K on Feb 06, 2008 05:53 PM Permalink
The beauty doesn't lie in the beaches. And if it is beautiful (Although it's NOT), it's no surprise to see the city missing from the list 'coz this survey includes only the growing cities in terms of GDP. And mind you, Surat is the CLEANEST city of India. Get ur facts right!
inside city the land value andthe flat valueincreased enormously without any new points,it is because of various it , ites and BPO employment, and retail also has to be developed because of new population inside city,first of all all government should develop infrastructure in around city and go for it, ites and BPO industries, otherwise you are crowding the city and the existing things has to be shared with more people example roads and flats and so on, unncessarily increasing the value of flats and lands
RE:why u guys missed on Visakhapatnam (Vizag)?
by Pahadi Chuha on Feb 06, 2008 03:28 PM Permalink
Jai Bihar!! Uttar bharati divas shud be declared a state holiday in maharashtra
RE:why u guys missed on Visakhapatnam (Vizag)?
by Bjp harbe on Feb 06, 2008 03:30 PM Permalink
Eh chuha mein Bihar ka nehi...tu guess kar...bohut gal raha hein na apna city ka bari mey jan ke?
Delhi is growing in terms of infrastucture only because of common wealth games otherwise sheela dixit and other political leaders had finished it, like blue line or killer line buses are killing people here
only bhaiyyas and poor orissa people migrate to surat in search of diamond polishing jobs. otherwise most of surat is still gujju dominated. just growth in one industry which is such an unorganzied sector full of black money like diamonds dosen't make surat no.1. in fact it should not even be in top 10.
Rediff is giving a wrong information about the growing cities. Why the author has ignored Chandigarh, Cochin and he has included underdeveloped city Bardhman (Burdwan). I doubt how many people outside Bengal heard about this city? Those who are in acdemics must have heard about Burdwan University. Rediff should give the correct information to its readers. they should not give any information from the facts received through telephones or other medias. Before preparing such a report, the reporter could have travelled through all the major cities of India and study the growth rate with the help of local bodies.
RE:Wrong information
by Bjp harbe on Feb 06, 2008 03:21 PM Permalink
There are many things you dont know-But it is always good to know-So you know it now?
RE:Wrong information
by Bjp harbe on Feb 06, 2008 03:18 PM Permalink
This is Govt of India survey-People who read Economic times must have read this earlier-This is no Rediff survey.
RE:Wrong information
by Allah on Feb 06, 2008 03:50 PM Permalink
Kolkutta and Burdhaban should be ranked with African cities like Gonder and Kassala. They are way backward.
RE:Wrong information
by SP on Feb 06, 2008 03:22 PM Permalink
Gurgaon is in a developing stage. This city still lacks proper drainage, garbage disposal, law and order, water supply etc. But it is a fact that in near future it will be the No.1
