Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9 messages Pages | 1
The article has lot of errors
by on Mar 13, 2007 03:01 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I do not understand how website of this repute allows so many errors that too on a financial subject where anything less than 100% accuracy is not acceptable.

With one reading itself i found few major errors here..

Dividend Distribution tax on Debt fund has been increased only in case of liquid/money market funds and not on all the debt funds.

The long term capital gain on Debt Mutual fund applies only after one year of holding and not on three years of holdings.

The schemes selected here are those schemes which are meant only for 1 day to 3 months investments and no way it should be bought or sold for more than six months. There are variour other types of debt funds available which has potential to give far better returns in one year than the schemes selected.

The dividend amount has been mentioned as Rupee and nowhere it has been mentioned what is the NAV of the scheme. This is a clear violation of SEBI law. Without NAV the dividend amount is of no use at all..The templeton Short term plan quarterly dividend NAV is Rs.1021/- Now the dividend per unit of Rs.13.15 has the relevance.
The way the dividend figures are presented here
clearly misleds the investors.

The dividend distribution tax on Rs. 90000/- based on 28.325% dividend distribution tax comes out to be only Rs.19866 and not Rs.25,493 as mentioned here. The author have not seen the rules clearly that the dividend distribution tax applies on the amount the investor receives in his hand and not on the amount the Mutual Fund reduces from the NAV/Scheme. In the above case Investor receives Rs. 70,134/- in his hand and a 28.325% on the amout Rs.70,134/- comes to be Rs. 19,866/- (90,000-19,866). This fact is not even known to most of financial advisors. One can talk to the operation team on any fund house and they will confirm this.

Yes I do agree with the author that some of Debt Funds are better than Bank FDs, but it is for all the investors and not only for high tax bracket investors. These schemes are the Fixed maturity plans which are offering more than 10% returns in one year vis a vis Bank FDs who are offering 7.50% to 8.00% returns in one year.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:The article has lot of errors
by Rajesh S on Mar 13, 2007 03:20 PM  Permalink
Check out the link below for banks offering deposit rates of 9% and above...

http://www.ichp.in/forum/forum.asp?forum_id=14

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:The article has lot of errors
by Nikki on Mar 13, 2007 04:50 PM  Permalink
All the AAA rated banks are offering more than 9% p.a. interest(but n on are giving 10%) only for the period of 3 yrs plus. While the Fixed Maturity Plans are offering 10% to 10.25% for 12 months and 3 days flat, that too with double indexation benefits. Only the second and third tier banks are offering 9.25% to 9.75% for more than 400 days.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:The article has lot of errors
by beni thamarasseril on Mar 13, 2007 03:43 PM  Permalink
thanks for letting us know... !!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:The article has lot of errors
by NoWork AllPlay on Mar 13, 2007 03:33 PM  Permalink
GOOD JOB BUDDY.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Good article
by kamalesh vasudeva on Mar 13, 2007 02:46 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Thanks for the guidance.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Good article
by NoWork AllPlay on Mar 13, 2007 03:34 PM  Permalink
This thanks was for the corrections or the original writeup. be clear maan.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
interruption by TV anchors
by Rama devi K on Mar 13, 2007 02:25 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

any reason why tv anchors especially on cnbc tv18 interrupt each other and also the guests who speak on particular stocks and investing.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:interruption by TV anchors
by NoWork AllPlay on Mar 13, 2007 03:34 PM  Permalink
Wrong forum to share this view

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 9 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message