USA----------------NEGATIVE POPULATION AND CONSTRUCTIVE PEOPLE EUROPE-------------NEGATIVE POPULATION AND CONSTRUCTIVE PEOPLE RUSSIA(SIBERIA)----NEGATIVE POPULATION AND CONSTRUCTIVE PEOPLE SOUTH AMERICA------NEGATIVE POPULATION AND CONSTRUCTIVE PEOPLE CHINA--------------POSITVE POPULATIOIN AND CONSTRUCTIVE PEOPLE INDIA--------------POSITIVE POPULATION AND CONSTRUCTIVE PEOPLE MIDDLE EAST--------POSITIVE POPULATION AND DESTRUCTIVE PEOPLE
SO LETS STOP THE POPULATION OF INDIA NOW AND BECOME LIKE EUROPE. BY THE TIME WE ARE RETIRING AS WE DON'T HAVE THE POPULATION TO REPLACE US.LET'S GET THE DOCTORS FROM EGYPT,NURSES FROM BANGLEDESH,CAB DRIVERS FROM AFGHANISTN...........
Petroleum subsidy has to be studied by experts and should be taken away from politicians. When there is an international pricing, petrol should be sold at international rate. But in India always it is more. Where the subsidy is going then? The Centre should device certain parameters for the collective growth of the entire Indian Union irrespective of party affiliation or caste consideration. If population growth has to be controlled then there should be proper rule that should be followed by every family. Leaders are supposed to tackle such issues than concentrating on mudslinging.
The folly of Indian fuel subsidies is one example of how bad demographics and bad democracy jointly threaten the country's future. In this fiscal year, the Indian government - wary of popular discontent - will spend an estimated $17.5bn or 2 per cent of national output on fuel subsidies because it refuses to pass on the greatly increased world price of energy to its citizens.
In theory the subsidies go to the poor, but in reality they are often diverted to benefit the urban rich. Perversely, subsidies also counteract such feeble attempts as there are to improve energy efficiency, and they drain the budget of funds that could be used to improve India's woeful education and healthcare.
The disadvantages of an increasing population is obvious to anybody except some so called experts, our netas and our babus, who coin idiotic phrases like demographic dividends. I wonder how many of these guys have more than 2 children, if they believe in the theory. Those who have more children did not need the support of this 'dividend' argument either, so this matters least to them. We need to control our population, education is the only way out, as then practical factors push the religious factors (about birth control)into the background, due to sheer necessity of survival. Lastly this indiscriminate population increase will lead India to ecological disaster.
RE:Demographic dividend, no disaster
by AG B on Dec 06, 2007 05:40 PM Permalink
u didnt say the only thing which makes sense to your folk. More people = more jihadis = moe chaos = more bomb blasts = more people to gulf
RE:Demographic dividend, no disaster
by lax on Dec 09, 2007 11:14 PM Permalink
Jalaluddin.. iam sorry to say, but u hv spoken like a true muslim...
uneducated/non-talented population will always be a burden on society. Bigger population will be good, if they are educated & skilled. But in a poor country like India, if you have BIG population, then we dont have enough resources to educate all... so for poor countries like India, BIG POPULATION = BAD
