Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 274 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14   Older >
Sell the house
by Mangesh on Apr 30, 2007 05:25 PM  Permalink 

Please sell off the house at the correct inflated rate at the end of 20 years in the second illustration, and then compare.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
buying a house
by ramprasad on Apr 30, 2007 05:24 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Are you interested in advising employees to pay heavy interest for the benfit of buying a house for their own.You have not mentioned about the prblems of maintenance and related troubles. every one in this country is at least aware of what they have to do with their earnings. Expert advise if some individual require please give. Don't render advise in common.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:buying a house
by Walter Dsouza on Apr 30, 2007 05:40 PM  Permalink
Take the advice if you want - or forget it - as simple as that -

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Should you buy a house or stay on rent
by unknown on Apr 30, 2007 05:21 PM  Permalink 

The Author is not correct in both cases

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Very basic comparision
by Aalok on Apr 30, 2007 05:20 PM  Permalink 

The article avails us with a very basic level comparision though they are all relevant but it misses certain important point such as appreciaton of asset, social security (ref: roti, kapada aur "makaan")etc..but nevertheless cheers for rediff on highlighting on more important issues rather than cricket and bollywood ash-abhi per se...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
improper comparision
by dharmendra rathore on Apr 30, 2007 05:20 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I think the author is a builder . Looking at low interest of people in buying a house due to unreasonable price coated by builders and high home loan rates, he his trying to deceive naive people by writing such a scrap article . I will advice him to come out of his imaginary world and write something meaningful next time.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RE:improper comparision
by Sunil Bhandari on Apr 30, 2007 06:04 PM  Permalink
the author may not a builder but the article looks like financed by builders. such sponsored articles are always one way trip to loss of ones life long savings. i suggest readers to be paid to read such stupid articles

   Forward   |   Report abuse
making fool
by jagat narayan on Apr 30, 2007 05:12 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Either Auther is fool or he is making us fool.
In the second case at the end of 20 yrs we have a asset of worth around 2cr (assuming that after nearly 7yrs property rates become double).therfore after 20 years actually we r creating a wealth of 2cr-0.74cr i.e. 1.26cr. BUt in the first case we r just spending 0.46cr and getting nothing. moreover the peace of mind we r getting of having ur own house is nowhere to compare. therefoe buying own house is always a good deal

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:making fool
by Vivek Kumar on Apr 30, 2007 05:15 PM  Permalink
I think you are repeating the same thing what has been mentioned in the last few lines of the article. Please read it again.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
house
by venkataraman krishnamurthy on Apr 30, 2007 05:12 PM  Permalink 

Mrrediff what about maintainance cost, taxation and other expenses i n a own house. dont make stupid calculations . THe own house value gete depreciated and we dont know how laon payer will behave.Best thing is what is on hand today live to that level rather than becoming and creating assets and paly gambling to get goofed up sometime

    Forward  |  Report abuse
OWN HOUSE OR RENTED ONE
by KHATRI, KUNAL on Apr 30, 2007 05:11 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Technically this artical is the fact. Finally one pays more for buying a home. But we all want to have our own SWEET HOME

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RE:OWN HOUSE OR RENTED ONE
by sumit gupta on Apr 30, 2007 05:15 PM  Permalink
HA HA HA. this is a bit shit... tell me one thing how can u compare a house worth 25 Lacs and a rent of 13.5 K per month... Imposs!!! Basic assumption is wrong

   Forward   |   Report abuse
What after 20 years
by sunny deol on Apr 30, 2007 05:10 PM  Permalink 

It's a good comparision, but the appreciation of

propery should also be considered in case of option 2. It's known fact how much the rates have appreciated in last 20 years. Even at half of that appreciation should have been taken.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
What if Mr.Kumar is on a transferable job?
by Kumar on Apr 30, 2007 05:07 PM  Permalink 

The analysis is sketchy and not complete. Now a days most of the jobs are transferable, or the person decides to move out from one city to another city or employer in a time period of 20 years. The whole number game then goes for a toss!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 274 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14   Older >
Write a message