(For some reasons, my original message were not posted. So here it is in a new subject to discuss.)
It was with some reservations that I read these article. The main one is any acknowledgment of BLE. As you know, a BLE can be changing the entire course of a process while not being detectable until we have been seen too much time passed. If such a thing does make an occurrence, then all previous thoughts should be restarted. It is best then to preconsider all potential BLE, but this is almost impossible to sustain!
RE:another inaccuracy
by Scrynt Cauldein on Jun 22, 2006 02:56 AM Permalink
There is more than one interesting point presented in this topic. Which is about finally acknowledging the presence of BLE, because the worse thing to do would be programming a problem into a system which has been planned well but events do occur, and not all of them beneficial. Also, I have already known that BLE is a current critical term, but have you also found that it is being transferred by word of mouth without much text appearance?
