Marriage is a failed Institution. Ask any married man and the tragedy is there. He has lost his life. The marriage has taken away all his joyful life. What remains is just misery. Girls have beautiful minds before marriage. Something changes in them immediately after marriage. They make a hell for the man. Beautiful minds turn into the most poisonous minds. Marriages are harmful to men and every man should try to ban this institution.
Live In Relationships is new concept but I feel it is really good. Stay together, get to know each other, Enjoy life as friends. If still you can get along you can have your children. If you do not get along, just stop the relationship there and depart in search of the real soul mate. The main hurdle in marriages is its difficulty to know whether you are marrying your soul mate or a partner in Life. Partnership is not good. It becomes business. Businesses give money & comfort and not the happiness & peace. How can everyone find a soulmate without staying together ? In 99% marriages, the marriages are between two bodies not between two souls. Any method to ensure two loving souls live together to enrich their living is welcome instead of a cunning mind of women making her life comfortable at the cost of husband.
RE:RE:In Search of a Soul Mate
by sukhmeet singh on Aug 17, 2007 02:51 PM Permalink
hi manuel
In this world there are two types of people - good and bad. It seems you are more influenced by the later category.
Just have a positive approach towards life. All girls are not the same.I definitly agree with you that todays culture has deteriorated and this has affected the female population. Marriage is not so harmful if you choose your partner with care. Let honesty , truth , love , trust and commitment become cornerstones of your relationship and see the same blossom like nothing else.
Live in relationships are best for stars if they opt it.But for any person who respects Indian culture and values it is the worst.For popular stars ,for those who have enjoyed enough of everything before marriage,they would have developed some sense of intoelerence and they would have a feeling that the world is nothing but money.throw money,you would get everything.this would be their attitude.Such people's each and every activity would be a feast to media.If it is a live in rel,and if it breaks afterwards,public wont be that much interested in them as if they knew it would.Mainly the mentality of the people who support live ins is...ha,this is safe.we can break at anytime without any legal commitments!!its just a livein!!I have not committed any sin!!!!!i'm a free bird now!!!!!!!!
If all peoples make live-in, what Pujari-mans eat? If all peoples make live-in, what Wedding Caterer-mans eat? If all peoples make live-in, what Sonar, Sari-shop-mans eat? Tell-Tell, Bolo-Bolo! But after my 2 peg, I thinking if 2 dils happy together, why not? Let Pujari-mans, Caterer-mans,Sonar, Sarishop-mans all become bikhari standing at traffic-signaal with langda-lullas, Chakaas and lepers!
The indian culture lets one to be feminine, still with a distinct place to grow. Ignore the slandoue of cultural revolutionaries for a moment. Modern culture mixes it up, often ladies go with boys attire. The mixing is not required. The distinctive identity can be maintained when respected, when realized by everybody, when dealt with respect, rather than passion. The live in relationships are devoid of strong vow, they mix up to apparent one, non-difference when in fact the difference is covered up. This is sycophancy. And yes, this erodes the distinctive assertion of feminity of indian culture.
See some messages below, people wonder what is there in a piece of mangalsutra, probably when plastic or leather chains are easily available.
They are quite right, just that they forget they were born to and raised in whatever difficulties by a vow.
Oppurtinists want to break that vow, and intrestingly there are so many ladies in it. Ladies would suffer the most when marriage breaks down !
Marriage is also a live-in rekationship, with a strong vow. Those who advocate the most important bndage with a oppurtinistic vow are cowards and oppurtinists. Society shouldn;t be influenced by these people for its own good.
