Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 41 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Unfair
by pvinayagam on Sep 26, 2006 11:29 AM  Permalink 

While I sympathise with those who are affected by the limitation in the number of attempts, I take up the case of SC/ST students.

The number of attempts, under the new format, will be the same for both general and reserved category students. Such equitable treatment is really inequitable, in the sense, in all Entrance and Competitive Exams, the two categories are not treated on par. The latter gets at least a chance more. We dont go into the 'whys' of this here; but only note that IIT-JEE ploughs a lonely furrow, clearly dodging the existing rules of the MHRD.

If general category students get two chances, the SC/ST students may get at least three, if not more.

As of now, the intake of SC/STs in IITs every year is just below 50% of the total quota with more number of attemtps. Now, how will the IITs fill up the quota after restricting the number of attempts and treating them at par with others? The intake will go down further.

For IITs, the right hand does not know what its left hand is doing!

Perhaps, they will wake up when the IITs will be left with nil students from the reserved categories!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Two attempts
by Jomy Sara Joseph on Sep 02, 2006 07:25 PM  Permalink 

This is really unfair,cutting down the number of attempts to two.
If the student who fails to attempt in the second chance too, won't he be givenmore chances ,provided the age can take into account to cut the number of attempts.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
iit-jee
by neeraj pandey on Oct 05, 2005 12:00 PM  Permalink 

the new rule is very unfair for rural students.how can u expect 60% frm a rural student and no. of attempts is quite ridiculous.in 1999 Rajat Raina frm hyd topped jee (A.I.R- 4). His marks in +2 is 46.9%.So how can u ignore a student like that, I mean its not good.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
This is another crap from Government of India
by Sudheer on Sep 28, 2005 02:53 PM  Permalink 

This is a piece of crap is very much in line with what was thrown on the country's another league of premier colleges i.e. IIMs.

What makes the management to decide the % of XII as criteria for IITJEE when each board acts as an independent body to conduct their exams?

Why two times to take the exam ? What are the rationale behind this decision?

In my opinion, students must oppose such a move since this decision could potentially , make or mar the future of candidates.

-sudheer

    Forward  |  Report abuse
I am sad.............
by mohammed masood on Sep 23, 2005 10:32 PM  Permalink 

This is by far the most ridiculous and unbecoming of the law makers to devise such a format for the Indias' most premier engineering institute. this will not only mar fortunes of those who somehow dont get decent score(the reason could be many especially in case of State boards) in their exams but also to those rural candidates who get to know about such exams only after giving their XII exams. lastly the format is not going to test and measure the true and raw basic engineering skills (alongwith depth) of candidates.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
IIT new rules.
by Purushottam Dayama on Sep 19, 2005 01:01 AM  Permalink 

The new rules are ridiculous.
1)Why should IITs rely on the results of 12th exams of
various boards? there are some very strict boards and some very generous boards.So should all students go to Lalu land and get more than 60% for just to qualify?
Are IITs surrendering their superior selection proceedures to Boards where there can be any amount of
corruption & Nepotism? It will be better to setup new board with power to just screen students all over India if they are scraping the screening tests.
2) What if a student due to many unfortunate circumstances get just 59% in Board, is he barred for
LIFE from appearing to IIT, when there is no possibilty to appear at the board exam 2ND TIME & thus
improve %ge?
3)Why IITs wanting MERITOCRACY still have quota system
for SC & ST students? Isn't it enough that they are given so much incentives and help thru out to board exam and qualifying criterion?

4)*********This writer a hearing handicapped got just
48% in qualifying exam. and still cleared JEE whereas
other classmates getting 70-80% couldn't. Thanks GOD !
No silly rules were in force 30 years ago!*******

    Forward  |  Report abuse
my opinion
by joisa on Sep 18, 2005 10:59 AM  Permalink 

this change is good for rural students
problems may arise in selection

    Forward  |  Report abuse
reforms for the better
by vijay on Sep 17, 2005 10:30 PM  Permalink 

i feel that the reforms will reduce the dependence on coaching institutes and correspondence courses and will make students take their boards a bit more seriously. the restriction on the number of attempts is fair enough as a student must realise that if he doesnt get in with two attempts then he doesnt deserve to be an IITian

    Forward  |  Report abuse
reforms for the better
by vijay on Sep 17, 2005 10:29 PM  Permalink 

i feel that the reforms will reduce the dependence on coaching institutes and correspondence courses and will make students take their boards a bit more seriously. the restriction on the number of attempts is fair enough as a student must realise that if he doesnt get in with two attempts then there are better guys

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 41 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message