RE:How Mumbai will Win
by Guest on May 27, 2008 11:52 PM Permalink
i m agree.after playing alot of cricket he doen'st still know how to bowl in pressure. and also nehra and zaheer both are responsible for the indian defeat in 2003 world cup and after seeing his bowling in this match i m sure he is still at the same level. Its bad that dhobi is in final.
Dravid%u2019s performance is better than ganguly N sachin and both are considered as natural stroker of ball IN IP T 20 tournament dravid is excelled better than ganguly tendulkar n ganguly BUT unlucky his team mates did not support him%u2026RCB lost many matches bcuz most of players failed to perform for team and lost many matches with low margin dravid 13 matches 360 runs average 30.01 SR 127.65 Tendulkar 6 matecs 148 runs 24.66 average and SR110.66 Ganguly 14 matches 349 runs average29.08 Sr113.68
RE:Dravid%u2019s performance is better than ganguly N sachin
by Neo on May 27, 2008 09:17 PM Permalink
Yes you are right! Because of this Dravid's captaincy and performace of "360 runs average 30.01 SR 127.65 "!, they are down in the list after MI& KKR.
all over the world, whereever there are league formats, there are no semis and finals...it makes sense coz then the teams that have already qualified will still fight with the same vigour...coz there its all about points... and if it is so required to have semis and finals...then play it the UCL way...the semis should also be a home and away games...while the final shud be a one off game at a neutral venue...
Dravid%u2019s performance is better than ganguly N sachin & ganguly and tendulkar are considered as more taletnted strikers of ball IN IP T 20 tournament dravid is excelled better than ganguly tendulkar n ganguly BUT unlucky his team mates did not support him%u2026RCB lost many matches bcuz most of players failed to perform for team and lost many matches with low margin
RE:Why they are not playing......
by Suman bhat on May 27, 2008 12:18 PM Permalink
Dravid%u2019s performance is better than ganguly N sachin and both are considered as natural stroker of ball IN IP T 20 tournament dravid is excelled better than ganguly tendulkar n ganguly BUT unlucky his team mates did not support him%u2026RCB lost many matches bcuz most of players failed to perform for team and lost many matches with low margin
Guess this is the only stupid "league" which has semifinals and finals. Leagues are meant to test consistency. IPL is playing extra 3 matches to suk up more advertising/collection money. Rajastan Royals have already won it in the true sense. Well done Warne and team
RE:Rajasthan Royals are true winners
by vasanth bhat on May 27, 2008 11:21 AM Permalink
Mr. viper how stupid u can go, all the league matches have finals. dont u see football. y do they let fools blog on net,
RE:Rajasthan Royals are true winners
by vimal b on May 27, 2008 11:48 AM Permalink
Mr Bhat... Does EPL or La Liga or Serie A has any Finals or semi finals... Look before you leap... sorry... speak...
RE:Rajasthan Royals are true winners
by dave grohl on May 27, 2008 12:00 PM Permalink
But Vimal cricket has always been like this... so dnt u think this will become a very diff thing
Bcos there are 20 teams in the Football leagues and it is spaced out for almost 10 months which is not the case in cricket ...
RE:RE:Rajasthan Royals are true winners
by rajesh kumar on May 27, 2008 05:04 PM Permalink
Mr vasanth have u seen Man united playing against Chelease to claim EPL? just dont cry if u don know the facts? Do u want more examples?
I would like to suggest IPL management to make the format like EPL where there is no final or semi-finals. Team that garners maximum number of points should be declared as champion. If you follow this format all the matches would look like important match. See if RR loses to teams like CSK in semi isn't that be unfair to RR to be at no. 3 or 4.
RE:IPL format should be like EPL
by gunda on May 27, 2008 10:40 AM Permalink
if rain came in bangalore then how mumbai i ndians are winners of ipl 2008
