Most of their big stars have gone... Mathew Hayden, Michael Hussey. Now it would be interesting to see how chennai performs. My money is on Rajasthan Royals ... they have the right combination of best bowler in shane warne, explosive batsmen like Graeme Smith, Shane Watson and Ravindra Jadeja. Even Delhi Daredevils are strong contenders with sehwag and gambhir openers and mcgrath and mohd asif as frontline bowlers. Rahul Dravid, Laxman, Ganguly are test captains they can't play like Rohit Sharma, Hayden, Hussey, Dhoni etc.
RE:ipl point table
by gonsalves on May 02, 2008 12:27 AM Permalink
Lalcahand Rajput is a head-less coach, no individuality, just striving only for money and doesn't really have inspiring and authoritative ability
RE:SRK should be at the bottom
by daisydaiisy on May 02, 2008 12:33 AM Permalink
moron he is superstar since 16 years. were u sleeping like kumbhakaran for these 16 years?
RE:SRK should be at the bottom
by rajesh pandey on May 02, 2008 05:22 PM Permalink
SRK doesn't deserve to be the superstar but it seems his stars are at right place. however I hate him. I wish his team loses all matches.
RE:Chennai Super Kings
by sharat vyas on May 01, 2008 04:11 AM Permalink
Whatever guyssss.....this is the series in which only the fittest and toughest will win....enjoy the game...let the best win.....
Chennai is hot jaipur improving a lot delhi a much better lot kolkutta a long shot mohali in a spot hyderabad missing a lot Mumbai in a knot bangluru in a rot
RE:who's who
by Junglee on May 02, 2008 09:27 AM Permalink
Yes, you are right at this juncture. Wait and watch over next 10 daya. With all those key players leaving, where MI, BRC are going to and where Chennai and Kolkatta will nd up! You may need to coin another set of rhyming words.
its really shocking to see crisis with sri sant as he is not a very good performaers,only the seniors of team harrashing him rudly, sri sant is a new generating performer,as per my view seniors should understand the needs of juniors.
RE:sri sant juniority
by isit notso on Apr 30, 2008 09:50 PM Permalink
huh !!!! what's that again.... ''new generating performer '' what is that . Just imagine new generating performer, generating gas I presume??????