RE:RE:INDIA HAS NOT WON IN FINALS
by rajesh prajapati on Jul 06, 2008 12:43 PM Permalink
History is always written after the event and we should write the history of the sixth final meeting after the match that we will win today and set the history book right!
RE:INDIA HAS NOT WON IN FINALS
by harish rana on Jul 06, 2008 12:32 PM Permalink
I think u are shri lankan. u are supporting vary much shi lanka. i Think u not seen RAMAYAN when Indian Ram beat Shrilankan Rawan. I think U are relative of RAVAN.
RE:INDIA HAS NOT WON IN FINALS
by harish rana on Jul 06, 2008 12:26 PM Permalink
I think you are sleeping that day when india beat twice australia in Last australia tour.
Sachin Tendulkar is the biggest Match winner in the Finals, This is the Proof:
I will give only one(1) Example, Best Tournament is that Tournament which has Best of 3 Finals bcoz it gives Equal Chance to both Teams to win the Finals.In the Recently held CB Tri-Series in Australia which was the Last Tri-Series in Australia bcoz from now on they will play only against Arch Rivals England.
Sachin Tendulkar scored 117 and 91 runs the 2 Finals which No Indian Batsman has ever played, In Fact the 117 runs scored by Sachin Tendulkar is the Highest scored by any Batsman in the Finals.According to Me this Victory in Australia is almost equal to India winning Champions of Champions in Australia in 1985 and Sachin Tendulkar scored 117 and 91 runs in both Finals.
So, Sachin Tendulkar is the biggest Match winner in the Finals...........................................................................
RE:Sachin Tendulkar is the biggest Match winner in the Finals(Proof)......................................
by Sameer Arshad on Jul 06, 2008 12:20 PM Permalink
Sorry...you are absolutely wrong, except 1 or 2 games, sachin is incapable for finals, he never played the way he should supposed to be played.
RE:RE:Sachin Tendulkar is the biggest Match winner in the Finals(Proof)......................................
by Barack Obama on Jul 06, 2008 12:24 PM Permalink
Totally wrong STG...........Sachin is a total non performer in finals except for 1-2 ocassions. Ans 1-2 occassions are very few in 400 matches.
RE:Sachin Tendulkar is the biggest Match winner in the Finals(Proof)......................................
by harish rana on Jul 06, 2008 12:20 PM Permalink
You are wrong. When sachin in the team india never won final match. Today team is vary good and only this team will win Asia cup.
Yuvi and Kaif partnership helped India win the Nat west trophy in England in 2002. We lost in ten consecutive finals(ODIs) before winning Natwest Trophy. Then we lost in ten consecutive finals(ODIs) after Natwest trophy and then won the CB series in Australia. Source Cricinfo.
As someone correctly pointed out in a rediff discussion board (Thanks to that guy ). I am rewriting his statement.
SACHIN is great SOURAV is great DRAVID is great We made them billionaires. They are the richest cricketers on earth. We worshipped them as Gods. Is there any other team in which three greats played together at one time and still no WC won. They were also the captains of our teams. How much more attention they want. In a career of more than 400 matches and when you are considered a god of cricket...and worshipped ....there should be more than just 2-3 occasions when you helped your team chase 300. 2003 WC final ?
RE:No world cup
by harish rana on Jul 06, 2008 12:23 PM Permalink
sachin sourav and dravid is basi roti. and i don't like this type of basi khana. so please through this meal to in dustwin. Please don't talk about sachin sourav and dravid. if u are interested in basi khana then talk about kapil, gavaskar, and old player.
RE:No world cup
by Barack Obama on Jul 06, 2008 12:05 PM Permalink
Laras, Pollock, Donald,Waqar, Ambrose , Walsh were also greats and their teams did not win world cups but they are all not billionaires, not worshipped and were not the highest paid. Pollock, donald,walsh, ambrose seldom led their teams.
I bet my last dime just put the current Indian batting line up under Australian, English or New Zealand tracks and let them cross 200 successfully. The tracks they are currently playing in are even worse than the Indian tracks. Flattest of the flat wickets with absolutely nothing in it for the bowlers, and these flat track bullies are munching upon the meat. I'll always be an Indian suppporter and want India to win today, but that's the truth.
RE:For all the golating ....
by Cool guys on Jul 06, 2008 11:55 AM Permalink
So,do I put any team in these conditions they wld cross 300 and any team in Australian or English conditions it wld not be so easy.Every one knows it now wat is tat so special abt ur bet which u posted above.Donot waste ur time posting airy comments,meaningless when every one knows it.Remember India won the CB Series. and dont be a Dumbo.
RE:VEERU AND GAMBHIR
by Singha on Jul 06, 2008 01:11 PM Permalink
u seem to know no cricket and some of those that are commenting seem to be downright jokers.
RE:VEERU AND GAMBHIR
by aishwarya patil on Jul 06, 2008 01:24 PM Permalink
hello first pair was federicks and grrenidge then federicks retired and than it was greenidge and desmond haynes dear
RE:VEERU AND GAMBHIR
by SachinTheGreat on Jul 06, 2008 11:42 AM Permalink
Ur watching Cricket from that Time, So U must be very Old Lady.......................................................................
RE:VEERU AND GAMBHIR
by SachinTheGreat on Jul 06, 2008 11:44 AM Permalink
BTW that was just a Joke but Ur Comparision is Ridiculous bcoz Viru Sehwag and Gautham Gambhir are much better than those 2.......................................................................
RE:VEERU AND GAMBHIR
by Cool guys on Jul 06, 2008 12:01 PM Permalink
Its really stupid to compare greats of cricket.They were the best in their era and Viru and Gambhir are playing now.One cannot say that viru and gambhir are the best lets wait they are only hardly 2 or 3 series old they have lot to prove to stand any where near greats like ROY FEDERICKS AND GORDON GREENIDGE and also Sachin and Ganguly etc.....we would be really happy if they can play a part in winning the world cup like ROY FEDERICKS AND GORDON GREENIDGE did.
RE:Today..........................
by rambo only on Jul 06, 2008 12:20 PM Permalink
AFTER 1998 , INDIA HAS NOT WON AGAINST SRI LANKA IN A FINAL MATCH, THOUGH THEY HAVE NET 5 TIMES.
SO HISTORY IS ON SRI LANKA'S SIDE AND THE TREND IS LIKELY TO CONTINUE. NOTHING ABNORMAL. HE WILL BE FOLLOWING FOOTSTEPS OF GREATS SACHIN, GANGULY AND DRAVID
In all the 300 chases sachin never helped India chase 300 and these aaj kal ke chokre chasing 300 with ease..so why to keep buddha people in team..sachin saurav dravid please wait for test matches as u have failed all the tests in one dayers..no oldies in the team
RE:where are all the sachin/saurav/draved lovers?
by Dire Straits on Jul 06, 2008 11:35 AM Permalink
Oh really ? Then who helped India chase a mamooth 320 plus score in England last year ? Tendulkar scored 93 in that game and won the MOM award. Remember ? Those were the tracks of England, unlike the pathetic flat tracks where the current flat track bullies are scoring above 300.
RE:where are all the sachin/saurav/draved lovers?
by Cool guys on Jul 06, 2008 12:10 PM Permalink
I completely agree with u chasing 300 on feather beds is not a great thing.Lets wait and see how these young chokre's perform in Australian or English winter conditions,on which Sachin,Dravid and Ganguly proved themselves.most of the chokres in this team never played in Australian or English winter conditions.So we cannot say they are best.Sachin was and is the Spine of Indian batting in tough conditions.Its really immature to compare Sachin with this team,which is not even completed one season completely.people who compare this team with Sachin are really emotional nuts who can never be practical.If the same team looses they'll say axe the captain bla...bla....blaaaa.... Time waste no real meaning in those statements.
RE:where are all the sachin/saurav/draved lovers?
by Barack Obama on Jul 06, 2008 11:57 AM Permalink
In a career of more than 400 matches and when you are considered a god of cricket...and worshipped ....there should be more than just 2-3 occasions when you helped your team chase 300. 2003 WC?
India will win the asia cup and same team will go on to win the 2011 world cup.Just include sachin in the team for wc.dada dravid laxman kumble should search for alternate careers.
RE:india win
by Cool guys on Jul 06, 2008 12:13 PM Permalink
Yup its too early to say.We can win 17 or 18 games in a row but still can manage to come out of a major tournment in the first round itself. :-)
Yuvi and Kaif partnership helped India win the Nat west trophy in England in 2002. We lost in ten consecutive finals(ODIs) before winning Natwest Trophy. Then we lost in ten consecutive finals(ODIs) after Natwest trophy and then won the CB series in Australia. Source Cricinfo.
As someone correctly pointed out in a rediff discussion board (Thanks to that guy ). I am rewriting his statement.
SACHIN is great SOURAV is great DRAVID is great We made them billionaires. They are the richest cricketers on earth. We worshipped them as Gods.
Still no world cup when they played. How much more attention they want.
RE:The greats
by Singha on Jul 06, 2008 01:15 PM Permalink
dravid at least is a worthless rat and does not even deserve to be in dubai/bongdesh's eleven.
RE:The greats
by Dire Straits on Jul 06, 2008 11:37 AM Permalink
Neither did Brian Lara, Shaun Pollock, Allan Donald, Waqar Younis, Curtley Ambrose, Curtney Walsh, etc win any World Cups for their respective teams. Yet they will always be greatest of the game.
RE:The greats
by Barack Obama on Jul 06, 2008 11:43 AM Permalink
Please write about three greats who played together in a team and still th team did not win word cup.
RE:The greats
by Barack Obama on Jul 06, 2008 11:47 AM Permalink
Laras, pollocks, donalds,waqars are all not billionaires, not worshipped and are not the highest paid. Pollock, donald,walsh, ambrose seldom lead their teams.
RE:The greats
by Cool guys on Jul 06, 2008 12:21 PM Permalink
Is it their fault if the team does'nt support them.They played well but the team was not there at all to win the cup...Any player who scores the max no of runs in a world cup (Sachin),wat else can he do he is not a magician.So,dont blame the greats but accpet the reality the same team with out sachin's contribution wld have come out of the world cup in the first round itself.See what happend in 98 world cup semis till Sachin was there he carried Inidian hopes.But once he was out the team collapsed.As is in the test match against Pak..Once he got out due to Back pain the remaining wickets could'nt even score 12 runs....with these kind of teams u cannot expect the world cup and Sachin did play well its not his fault......thats the trurh...
RE:I SAY
by pakaya on Jul 06, 2008 11:47 AM Permalink
It means Srilanka's batsmen will bowl and bowlers will bat. "What an idea, it can change Indian cricket".
