Pl.Mr.Hayden,you are one of the best against India but we need not tremble and fumble merely because we are playing Aussies.No.1 according to you is boring till recently and No.2 is challenging till Perth,for us.Now to get challenging for again why not you swap places with us.Ponting said to Indian press that we are next playing at Perth and India must "beware".India is now "Be Where" they MUST Be - very next to U and can nudge U down the slopefrom the Podium-remember one Mr.Pawar.
RE:India Be Where
by sridhara jayateertha on Jan 22, 2008 08:26 PM Permalink
the logic you are using applies both ways. had INDIANS play their best in past 15 years there will be no world champions other than Indians. they did not . so you people are so called WORLD CHAMPIONS. it is our gift for you. mind it . otherwise you were just like BANGLADESH. give thanks to BUKNOR. he made you people WORLD CHAMPIONS> go through all matches in which Mr. BUKNOR afficiated { 80% matches since 1992 }you will know the truth................!. even some people [ CRICKETERS ] showed big hart some times. when lara caught gilcricht he said it bumped. malik caught pointing he said the same. it shows you are totly ............................?
RE:India Be Where
by hindublogger on Jan 22, 2008 10:55 PM Permalink
Dude Bucknor was best in business till 2 yrs back ..be reasonable.Its a game and about 70 percent of it is fixed ever since the D- Company started showing interest in the scheme of things.And why you guys conveniently forget the decisions that we gets in our favour?
RE:India Be Where
by anand kumar on Jan 23, 2008 11:01 AM Permalink
the decisions we get in our favor are comparatively only 10 per cent to that of 90 per cent by the other teams. dont be confused. check the facts. It is always Indian team that gets the bad deal from the so called Elite Panel of umpires,especially when the game is in crucial stage. that is y some mistakes are called human errors and the remaining being biased. guess u got the point in it.. unlike ponting
If Australia would have played with 11 players in the field in Sydney without the hidden hand of two umpire and the third umpire in the box the result would have been 1-2 in Indias favour This fact is recorded for posterity in cricket playing world.Hydden need keep one disc for his future.
HAD AUSTRALIA NOT HAD HELP OF BUCKNOR THE RESULT WOULD HAVE BEEN 2-1 IN FAVOUR OF INDIA.. SO MR. HAYDEN SHUT UP AND TAKE THE UMPIRES FOR DINEER,,, BCOZ THATS THE ONLY WAY AUSSIES CAN WIN
Mathew Hyden was reported to have challenged India to beat them in Adelade Test. Hyden may not be knowing that once Bill Lawry told the press conference in New Delhi in the late 60s that he would win the match and go for fishing on the fifth day. Poor Lawyery's team was defeated on the fourth day itself and he has paid heavy price for his arragance. Playing well is different and underating and challenging the opponents is difference. History will repeat. Let Australia play positive cricket with out undue support from the Umpires and let the better team wins.
RE:Perth Part 2
by Tera Baap on Jan 22, 2008 07:28 PM Permalink
AUSSIES have bad habit of throwing shiiit before any cricketing series starts! By the end of the series they wont be able to SHIIIIT! take my words!
RE:Another dirty mind game by Australians
by Tera Baap on Jan 22, 2008 07:26 PM Permalink
hayden means cockroch! Let me roll over the adeliade wicket. RP, Irfan will crush him!
RE:Another dirty mind game by Australians
by Sun on Jan 22, 2008 07:26 PM Permalink
Hayden maybe a good player,but now he is proving that he is a big mouth too.Cmon India show the bum what we can do.
