RE:Second Test Match Fixing
by sarvesh pawshe on Jan 12, 2008 07:16 PM Permalink
y hasnt d aussie board handed d BAGGY GREEN to benson and bucknor since de were also playing 4 australia !!
Why should there be a cool off? Absolutely no need. Aussies cheated the entire game of cricket. Ponting fixed Sydney Test with umpires, match referees and match proctor. BCCI should take immediate steps to book Ponting and umpires with match fixing case?
RE:Why to cool off?
by sarvesh pawshe on Jan 12, 2008 07:14 PM Permalink
i think ponting dint expect a backlash 4rm his own people e1 if he has won d record 16th test most of the aussies are not showing support
RE:Why to cool off?
by AN on Jan 12, 2008 07:19 PM Permalink
In facting they had been cheating, using unfair means AND intimidate vising sub-continent teams for long with the blessings of so called neutral umires and biased refrees and getting away. This time - enough is enough - India has revolted and shown the world their true colour. We will not tolerate injustice any more. CHAK DE INDIA
sir, it is the best way to restore good relationship--kumble, like buddha, will mesmerise pointing in the presence of madugulle. we can look forward to players playing cricket and entertain.best of luck--rajaram
Kumble Beware of Ponting Take heed of Symonds Come not near Clarke Have an eye to Malcolm Speed Trust not Ranjan Madugalle Mark well Mike Proctor James Sutherland loves thee not Thou hast wronged Brad Hogg
There is but one mind in all these men and it is besnt against Team India If thou beest not unbeatable look about thee SECURITY GIVES WAY TO CONSPIRACY THE MIGHTY MONKEY GOD HANUMAN PROTECT THEE (inspired by Julius Caesar)
RE:Hoshiarnama to Kumble
by on Jan 12, 2008 07:16 PM Permalink
awesome dude....i got the reference to shakespeare's "julius caesar".....very witty and apt.
will it be cool off for oz or will it be real cool off for millions of viewers back home in India. Lets wait & watch the oz behave. If it really happens, better is for cricket,otherwise cricket could be for wild dogs, as stated by oz reporter. Lets hope for the best.
Most of the people had missed an important point in the Sydney episode. The Match Referee who was supposed to be neutral had taken a biased stand. The Indian Team would have even taken the poor umpiring decisions in their stride, had it not been for Mr Proctor, who despite knowing the already heated situation with which the match ended, taken a biased view on Harbajan. I guess the Indian team would have even accepted Harbajan's ban (even if he had not said anything racial - but he did say something to Symonds) if Symonds had also been banned for provoking Harbajan, under the same ICC code. That would have even cooled the tempers to some extent. But Match Referee are not playing their part, by being biased. Even Proctor could have 'warned' the Umpires on the first day itself on their poor umpiring decisions which could have atleast made them little more cautious in the next 4 days. We have seen similar cases of Match Referees taking sides like Mike Deness who suspended 6 Indian players for excessive appealing in South Africa, while video footages show similar behaviour from 4 other SA players in the same match and none were punished. Same is the case of the Oval fiasco when Pak players walked out against on-field umpires decision, but Match referee(again our friend, Mike Proctor) was a mute Spectator and allowed Umpire Darell Hair to hijack the result of the match. Hence, Indian Team should have told BCCI that they would not play under Proctor rather than the umpires.
