RE:RE:Ponting the Terror
by saumitra singh on Jan 10, 2008 12:50 PM Permalink
its not the indians but the ponting himself who is so scared to face harbhajan that he want to keep harbhajan out of the game kayar humare khiladi nahi ponting hai u can look at the record dismissal of ponting by bhajji so have a thought!!!!!!!
THESE WHITE PEOPLES ARE JUST IMITATING THAT THEY ARE AGAINST RACICISM , INFACT THEY ARE SUPPORTES OF RACICISM , RATHER TO SAY THEY ARE ORIGINATORS OF RACICISM CONCEPT.
Mike proctor banned from 5 matches to Rashid Latif from Pakistan 4 years ago for the same act which was done by Ponting by pointing finger up towards umpire and helping wrong decision , Proctor is main culprit in this case and not the Ricky Ponting , the Tasmanian Wild DOG
RE:RE:ABout Role of Mike Proctor
by Adnan on Jan 10, 2008 12:46 PM Permalink
I will like to single out Procter and the way he treated LATIF CASE and PONTING CASE!
RE:RE:RE:ABout Role of Mike Proctor
by Indian on Jan 10, 2008 12:50 PM Permalink
Yes for Bhajji decision proctor not gave any date from next week or month , he gave judgement in 2 min, But for Bradd hog he wants to THINK AND DECIDE THE CASE hence date from next week has benn cosen
RE:ABout Role of Mike Proctor
by rajesh t on Jan 10, 2008 12:56 PM Permalink
Yes any monkey with the type of curly hair like symmonds will be banned from viewing cricket.
RE:RE:RE:ABout Role of Mike Proctor
by Indian on Jan 10, 2008 12:48 PM Permalink
Yes , They can do anything as wild dogs do not know what they are doing they are thinking that are highly enthusuastic but orientation is towards wrong direction
RE:ABout Role of Mike Proctor
by ralph nader on Jan 10, 2008 12:41 PM Permalink
the white south african are the worst racists--have you not heard of apartheid?
RE:ABout Role of Mike Proctor
by Indian on Jan 10, 2008 12:43 PM Permalink
Yes , but I mean to say only few whites who pretends that they are against racicism but there act doesn/t show this
RE:ABout Role of Mike Proctor
by abdul wadood on Jan 10, 2008 01:03 PM Permalink
What ever white says is true and what an asian say is not even consider. Bhai WHA Justice ki tho...
RE:RE:ABout Role of Mike Proctor
by Indian on Jan 10, 2008 12:46 PM Permalink
Yes , in such conditions all asian countries shoud gather together , even at the time of Inzi's decision of not playing along with boys India backed pak , Now only srilanka speaking out and supporting BCCI role , All asians should speak out
ponting was hell bent on equalling steve waugh's record of 16 consecutive win--whats wrong with that--are our indian cricketers not keen to achieve individual milestones? the way he went about it was however obnoxious--the indian team should shrug off the past and get on with it--no longer should they look for excuses but up the ante by playing well.
If Ponting is honest about wanting Austrlia to be most loved team he should he should either ask icc & acb to treat the second test as null and void or step down immediately and appologise for indulging in deliberate cheating! because it is clear from the video clippings of the test match that australia have won the 16th test in row by cheating the opposite team with the company of onfield umpires. he will not do either of these because A dog's tail is crooked and always remains that way, whatever you do.
This is not the first time that the Australian team has displayed a boorish attitude. It is high time that the team learns to be civilized, India is a role model it can try to emulate.
It is unfortunate that a man of this character would be mentioned alongside the great Steve Waugh, when it comes to the person holding the highest number of straight wins. while steve wagh has achieved the same by hard work and giving the oppositions the due respect, whereas ricky ponting and his team has done the cheapest way and awful behaviour. they have achieved most of their wins in this way only. the pointing and his men are shameless personalities. the whole world has seen the same on television.
we are sure that Ponting and his team will continue to beat the world but at the same time there will be no let up in their obnoxius behaviour.
if cricket australia has any self respect and pride they should sack ricky ponting, michel clerk, brad hogg and andrew saymonds from
RE:Australian team
by Prince on Jan 10, 2008 12:40 PM Permalink
The tape of the Sydney Test appears to back up the claims. It shows Ricky Ponting telling Harbhajan it was the second time he had crossed the line.........CricInfo(lip reading experts)
RE:Australian team
by abdul wadood on Jan 10, 2008 12:46 PM Permalink
But it not shows Harbhajan calling Monkey. When he can give out for an notout how can any one belive him.
RE:Australian team
by Madan Shanbhag on Jan 10, 2008 12:54 PM Permalink
I fully agree with you and your sentiments as well as explanations. You are also well aware that how Australian team behaved/treated with SHARAD PAWAR. BCCI should condemn strongly this type of attitude by Ponting, his team and Australian Cricket Board and teach a lesson.
i have got one report been published in one of the australia newspaper that ACB has bribed both umpires 10 crore each for decisions in favour of australia.
Imt is sickining to see that people like Clive Loyds thik that Steve Bucknor is greater than Cricket. I would like to see Buckner giving wrong descision against Ricky 3 times. He would be kicked out with in a day without mercy. How can Mr Speed directy influence the match refree in case of Yuvi and think he's running the world cricket. In fact he's running a Raciest Organisation in which all rules are for people who are not so white/ not so black. The teames from subcontinent are on the recieving end always. This appears to be a match fixed by Mr Speed to humilate Indians and the body language of the Ausses and Umpires clearly indicated that they were assured of full backing by ICC in advance. BCCI bosses are stupid ediots as ever and should have asked to make the Sydney Test null and Void and should make sure ICC CEO Mr Speed is sacked with full dishonour. If you have muscle than don't just show it but use it. I only hope mr Shrad Pawar knows this
RE:INDIA V/s AUSTRALIA CRICKET
by Younus Khan on Jan 10, 2008 12:38 PM Permalink
after all west indians are slaves of the white man they will support their plantation owners isnt it
I would not be surprised or wrong if I say that the Australians had decided to make a complaint against any Indian and they picked on Harbhajan long before the match. Why did Symonds start the exchange with Harbhajan who was at that time on the rescue act for India AND iNDIA went into a lead. Predetermined. Even though Symonds himself and Kumble suggested that the issue could be talked over, it was Ponting who refused. This is a clear indication that this complaint against Harbhajan was well planned and rehearsed. And they were also aware that in Mike Proctor, a South African, they would get a sympathetic hearing. Otherwise why should the evidence of some one who was nearest Harbhajan and Symonds be overlooked and the hearsay of Hayden (Symonds best friend), Clarke and Gilchrist was taken into reckoning though they were so far away from the scene where the exchange took place. I do not wish to comment on the arrogance and bad behavior of the whole Team after the match as the the pess in their on country have pulled up Ponting for his behavior. They felt their position as the number one threatened for the first time and they also have not yet come to terms with India winning the 20-20 tournament.
RE:READER POLL IN SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
by on Jan 10, 2008 12:37 PM Permalink
Looks like Indian netizens went and voted there. These Indians want Ponting out of the way because they are scared of him.
RE:READER POLL IN SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
by Prince on Jan 10, 2008 12:38 PM Permalink
The tape of the Sydney Test appears to back up the claims. It shows Ricky Ponting telling Harbhajan it was the second time he had crossed the line.........CricInfo(lip reading experts)
RE:READER POLL IN SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
by on Jan 10, 2008 01:30 PM Permalink
WHO ARE THESE PRINCE's AND DEVDASS OL TIME AUSSIE slaves. Living off their crumbs
