RE:mark mathew
by Mark Matthew on Jan 09, 2008 09:18 AM Permalink
The truth you say, do you even know what it means? Maybe you should educationalise that illiterate dolt mind of yours and speak only what you know of(nursery rhymes). Do u have any proof to call mother teresa a "body seller" or is it just a sick fantasy you indulge in shoving a lepers rod up ur ass? Moronic racist fools like you shouldn't bother posting in the forums. Leave it to the people who actually got educated and know something about the subject. Its fools like you who deserve to be locked in a ghetto. Reply with something sensible and if your providing an argument about mother teresa MAKE SURE its not baseless. Otherwise your just posting jibberish. Go to school fool.
sorry for reposting. the full is this. sorry for the previous. some crazy control did m't allow me anyway.
Welcome.
You know one of my aunt tells me, nobody will do anything which he thinks is wrong. they will do it and they will give some reasons to themselves to fell that it is correct or atleast not wrong, or atleast not wrong in those given circumstances. and they will tell the others the same reasons.
ok. according to you , ponting calimed it is a catch because he felt so , and some body asked in these replies , but he knows so that it was not clean, i have n't yet heard your answer probably it is early morning 3.30 in australia.
i will wait till whatever it is.
and clarke said it is clean. and we all know it is not. whether it is 50-50 , or 25 - 75 , or 75 - 25 ,i will leave it to you.
in which case he should have told , skipper i'm not sure. go for the replays or continue with not out.
now in this case clarke is wrong.you will tell me not to blame ponting.good.
now, for not walking , i always felt that , the batsman feels , some times even if don't nick they give me out , even if i'm not lbw out , they give me out.so,unless the umpires gives me out , i won't walk.
right thats what ponting and symonds did in first innings and hussy in second innings.but what is clarke doing in second innings.ya, waiting. As, according to hayden he will only leave if umpire lifts the finger.well , good. the same fellows says catch is clean , and feild captain
RE:view of a cricket lover and Mr.Micheal,will b glad,if you reply
by Cricket Fan on Jan 09, 2008 08:24 AM Permalink
Micheal,
ya, sorry for reposting.
you said in the earlier reply ,(whose some content some body reported , and it is not even showing, why? i do n't even know )
you speak about latisf's catch.
now if latif did wrong ,
it noway means ponting is right. a wrong is a wrong. then you say emotion of taking catch.
and for clark
you are saying , at no place it was shown that the catch was not clean. every body saw replays , and we can all say and see ,wether taking cleanly is in doubt , or not taking cleanly is in doubt. i see why you are good lawyer.when everybody else says -ve as in doubt, you come and say ve is in doubt, and no furthur evidence , go with the ve claim. suits you. i'm not explaining furthur.
and for ganguly and dhoni's half volley catches , you asked me shoild they have been suspended for 5 matches. i say , they shoild have been , and even now , if any body does any thing like that , indian , capatain, or other country player , do the same , and please do.
ceaser's wife is not above the law.
and i'm not saying this because you raised it. i'm saying it because i believe so. in fact i was not fully happy with sachin's hundred , as he is out lbw when he is 40.
now don't raise furthur. he can't walk because , that 's an lbw , and not plumb, but out 90%.don't ask me anybody is walking for plumb.thats lbw , and thats upto them.
so latif , and ganguly , dhoni(if what you said is true), should be banned.
RE:view of a cricket lover and Mr.Micheal,will b glad,if you reply
by Michael Mammen on Jan 09, 2008 08:43 AM Permalink
Dear Cricket Fan
My point is that Latif and Ponting's circumstances were COMPLETELY different. One actually dropped the ball, picked it up and claimed the catch, the other caught in in the air but was unable to avoid grounding the ball in hitting the ground.
The problem is that we never have enough cameras on the feet of every fielder, to get a perfect angle of the catch. There are also issuse about the shortening of foreground by camera lenses which can create optical illusions and doubt.
This is why some captains have asked to do away with the 3rd umpire, trust the fielder and if the replay CLEARLY shows the ball didn't carry, then they can be punished.
My point about Ganguly/Dhoni is that the ICC determined that these catches weren't liable for suspension like Latif - they have set the standard, so why punish Ponting now? Has the definition changed just because it was a tense game that India lost?
RE:RE:view of a cricket lover and Mr.Micheal,will b glad,if you reply
by SoftWords BigStick on Jan 09, 2008 09:42 AM Permalink
Latif and Ponting's circumstances are absolutely the same - it does not matter how you ground the ball, the point is that YOU (the fielder/catcher) know it is grounded and yet you claim the catch. That is the whole concept of a "gentlemanly" game where camera's are not really required.
RE:RE:view of a cricket lover and Mr.Micheal,will b glad,if you reply
by Cricket Fan on Jan 09, 2008 08:25 AM Permalink
and for ponting you already no.
and i hope who ever reported my clip ,the second part, has good reason, and i want to see what the moderator says about it.
RE:RE:RE:view of a cricket lover and Mr.Micheal,will b glad,if you reply
by Cricket Fan on Jan 09, 2008 08:26 AM Permalink
and for ponting you already know. sorry about the spelling and i hope who ever reported my clip ,the second part, has good reason, and i want to see what the moderator says about it.
Cricket WAS reazlly a gentleman's game. I remember a past incident when a batsmen was gievn out and he walked away from the field but the legendary G R Viswantah pointed that he was not actually out and the batsman was recalled to bat. Eventually India lost that match but the game won the hearts of the fans. Austarlians play like country brutes and for them victory is the only thing needed.They don't know about gentleness / magnanimity on the field. I think the most number of controversies include Australians.
this sledging, banter or crack or whatever this terminology of aussies, indians, or all these so-called internatioal crickers use and abuse....please read the following by MALINGA on Cricinfo: "Q:.....Strangely, you don't sledge batsman. Why? Answer: I never was one in favor of sledging. A bowler's job is to get wickets and it's to get it through his talent and not use unsportsmanlike conduct. International cricket is the biggest league and when you represent your country and act like that on the field it reflects badly on yourself, the team and the country. Besides: what's the big achievement anyway?
Let us not criticize Malinga for his bowling arm but my point is that Aussies have a liking for sledging [in the name of pride for the baggy of green or play hard and win whatsoever] but the world is catching up MATES!!
Symonds says that he was defending Brett, Is it? Why!! Brett can't take care of himself that Symonds had to intervene, especially when he has a history with Bhajji. But Symonds is known for confrontation [just like Bhajji].. so Symonds initiates but starts complaining once he doesn't like what he hears [true or not].
nevertheless, after all these days of fighting among us [the rediff readers that include me, you all, aussie or pakistan readers on the forum - either for the love of the game or just to irritate each other], it is time for India to prove that they can beat Aussies, especially Bhajii!! we wasted lots of energy on you, so prove it man!!!
RE:bhajji - you got a lifeline, so prove it
by Sam on Jan 09, 2008 08:21 AM Permalink
Mr. LMAO I can see your A** flying off your body. Now you are A** hole.
Hey Mr. Prem, we know you wear your patriotism on your sleeves. But patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel and, in this case, the pathetically inept and incompetent. Yes, that's what this Indian team is currently. Goddamned sore losers and a bunch of overpaid non-achievers..Bucknor or no Bucknor, we still would have lost. 3 wickets in 2 overs? Can't you spare a thought for this outrageous playing? Look in the mirror Mr. Prem, and see who's darkest of 'em all (pun unintended).
RE:michael mammen
by Mark Matthew on Jan 09, 2008 08:14 AM Permalink
Its ironic how you speak about other religions when you dont even have the courage to say which faith you follow.You have nothing to support your claim about "christian fanatics who are traitors". Basically you are just throwing random flames like an idiotic schoolkid that you might actually be or have the intellect of one. You just insulted a saintly woman who spent her whole life attending to orphans and as you say "beggars infected with leprosy". You might be a patriot(in my opinion probably a coward who sits at home and comments without having guts to actually do something) but your an insult to mankind. Your a disgrace to humanity to actually speak ill towards a woman who devoted her life helping the poor. I shouldn't even bother wid a dimwitted dolt like you with an IQ of a goat. GET HELP YOU LOSER!!!!
RE:michael mammen
by Onlooker on Jan 09, 2008 07:56 AM Permalink
Are you sure you speak the truth? You seem to have no clue what you are talking about??
The current series is named bollyline. There is lot of similarity with bodyline.
Anil Kumble (India Captain) --- Bill Woodful (Aussie Captain) (for his post match comments)
Ricky Ponting is the modern day Douglas Jardine who represents winning by hook or crook approach and who gloats over his opponents and does not respect their deeds worst doesnt even shake hands with them.
Andrew Symonds is the modern day Harold Larwood who was the tool used by Ponting to get to Harbhajan just like Larwood was used by Jardine to get to Bradman.
Iam sure Ponting, Symonds, Hayden, Clarke, Gilly and co are going to be in hot tomato soup when they visit india later in the year and i wont be surprised if the entire australian team is psyched out by the time the tour is over after Ponting has stirred hornet's nest by accusing Harbhajan
RE:bollyline...
by Sam on Jan 09, 2008 08:14 AM Permalink
I hope Indian people and Indian media should take revenge and show them how low those people are. But alas! it won't happen. Either we will forget about it or we will forgive them and will let them go
