RE:Drunkard?
by ankit agrawal on Jan 09, 2008 05:58 AM Permalink
U really must have an extremely low IQ to have found fault with the arguments in the article. Or perhaps u just cant stop complaining abt anything n everything.
RE:Drunkard?
by K.A.Kuttaiah on Jan 09, 2008 05:29 AM Permalink
Why may I ask you think so? Is the rationale put forward by him too much for you to digest or do you love in Australia?
RE:Drunkard?
by Salted Mushroom on Jan 09, 2008 05:46 AM Permalink
I second Mr Juttaiah. I guess this guy is never been taught what a logic is and what is language. So Mr Drunkard aka 'Anna" shut up. this page does not need another bullshit like you.
(5) All AUSTRALIAN players are eligible to keep commenting about all players on the field and the OPPONENT TEAM should never comment as they will be spoiling the spirit of the AUSTRALIAN team. Any comments made in any other language are to be considered as RACIALISM only.
(6) MATCH REFREE decisions will be taken purely on the AUSTRALIAN TEAM advices only. Player views from the other teams decisions will not be considered for hearing. MATCH REFREES are to be given huge bonus if this rule is implemented.
(7) NO VISITING TEAM should plan to win in AUSTRALIA. This is to ensure that the sportive spirit of CRICKET is maintained.
(8) THE MOST IMPORTANT RULE: If any bowler gets RICKY PONTING - "THE UNDISPUTED CRICKETER WITH INTEGTIRY IN THE GAME OF CRICKET" more than twice in a series, he will be banned for the REST OF THE SERIES. This is to ensure that the best batsman/Captain will be played to break records and create history in the game of CRICKET.
These rules will clarify better to all the teams VISITING AUSTRALIA
(1) Ricky Ponting (THE TRULY GENUINE CRICKETER OF THE CRICKET ERA AND WHOSE INTEGRITY SHOULD NOT BE DOUBTED) should be considered as the FOURTH UMPIRE. As per the new rules, FOURTH UMPIRE decision is final and will over ride any decisions taken by any other umpires. ON-FIELD umpires can seek the assistance of RICKY PONTING even if he is not on the field. This rule is to be made, so that every team should understand the importance of the FOURTH UMPIRE.
(2) While AUSTRALIAN TEAM is bowling, If the ball flies anywhere close to the AUSTRALIAN FIELDER(WITHIN 5 metre distance), the batsman is to be considered OUT irrelevant of whether the catch was taken cleanly or grassed. Any decision for further clarification should be seeked from the FOURTH UMPIRE. This is made to ensure that the cricket is played with SPORTIVE SPIRIT by all the teams.
(3) While BATTING, AUSTRALIAN players will wait for the ON-FIELD UMPIRE decisions only (even if the catch goes to the FIFTH SLIP as the ball might not have touched the bat). Each AUSTRALIAN batsman has to be out FOUR TIMES (minimum) before he can return to the pavilion. In case of THE CRICKETER WITH INTEGRITY, this can be higher.
(4) UMPIRES should consider a huge bonus if an AUSTRALIAN player scores a century. Any wrong decisions can be ignored as they will be paid huge bonus and will receive the backing of the AUSTRALIAN team and board.
(5) All AUSTRALIAN players are eligible to keep commenting about all players on the field and the
RE:Very Articulate
by Onlooker on Jan 09, 2008 04:08 AM Permalink
What is so great in that? Can you eloborate. Will you accept if I say something derogatory using your community name? It is a stupid article except that it whips up frenzy.
If many people admire then this guy would really think himself great. And when outside someone bursts the bubble, he won't be able to take it and he will be like emperor with no clothes. Then he comes back and vomits more and the vicious cycle goes on and on.
RE:Very Articulate
by Deep Indian on Jan 09, 2008 04:15 AM Permalink
What is so not great in this article. He has been very logical and articulate. He gone to great lengths in explaining why BCCI though being 50 times richer isn't pulling off the plug but only calling a spade a spade and that there are no evidences to prove that Harbhajan is not guilty at all. Besides television replays also prove the level of credibility that a captain of the most powerful cricketing nation carries. Need it be more clear unless logic is not your strong point.Or may be you are an outsider and does not feel good enough to standby India.
RE:RE:Very Articulate
by Amit Reddy on Jan 09, 2008 05:05 AM Permalink
Onlooker...shut the hell up. Instead of standing by your team..you say "I am setting the standards high for India". You choose to believe what the Aussies said about Bhajji and not him. There is a witness..Sachin Tendulkar for Bhajji, and you choose not even to believe him, while you probably choose to believe Ricky Ponting. I dont doubt your patriotism, but I do doubt your brains.
RE:Very Articulate
by Onlooker on Jan 09, 2008 06:16 AM Permalink
Amit, why Sachin is not saying "Bhajji didn't use the Monkey word in Sydney Test." This one statement from Sachin is good enough to clear Bhajji of the charges but I know Sachin wouldn't say it.
RE:RE:Very Articulate
by Onlooker on Jan 09, 2008 04:50 AM Permalink
What outsider? Ridiculous. Are you saying south africans were not patriotic when they implicated Cronje?
RE:Very Articulate
by Onlooker on Jan 09, 2008 04:48 AM Permalink
There are word against word cases and verdicts. You don't need conclusive proof. The prosecution had the witnesses necessary for evidence. What the defense should do is poke holes in prosecution's witnesses by cross examinationing and making them contradict thereby creating reasonable doubt. It appears that the defense didn't do a good job. Also it looks like Harbhajan didn't assert himself properly and clearly. Moreover, he didn't have a credible witness in Sachin when Sachin said things like he didn't hear Bhajji say such things etc which only proves that he is not a witness.
Nicely written article... there are a lot of a@@es out here in this board who'll criticise u or despise u for this.. but people who really understand what u typed in here, will appreciate ure points.... Good job!
RE:racist indians
by Onlooker on Jan 09, 2008 03:50 AM Permalink
Correct. India is a pluralistic society. Also becoming global. There is no place for such things at least for working class people, people in positions and ambassadors of our country. You have to keep it in your house or in your backyard just like Mr Panickar is doing.
RE:racist indians
by God on Jan 09, 2008 03:54 AM Permalink
Hey! Patriot, what do you mean by "racist Indians"?
You are a typical educated reader who believes other countries that yours, cos you think that it makes u a learned person... Bajji issue is blown out by the aussies and the famous aussie media that would do anything to back their players... even when the players hurt the feelings of others...
Aussies are a bunch of "talented cricketers" who has a great history of dragging the opponents family members in the field... the most classic example is talking bad abt Chris Cairn's dead sister..... if u look at this in any angle, its tasteless... and the aussie media supported it sayin.. its an on field thing.. dont bother!!
I am not sure what country you represent.. its better not to tell that out, cos ppl will spit on that country to have produced a patriot like you.....
RE:racist indians
by Jayanta Choudhury on Jan 09, 2008 04:00 AM Permalink
Whoever you are, you seem to be as stupid as your comment which does not come with reason. Unlike your Australian cohort, I am reporting it as abuse to show how Indians act against monkeys as Bhajji did label people like you.
