I believe that with so much happening around on & off the field, India shud curtail the Aussie tour n come back home.
India has been cheated from a well deserved win or atleast a definate draw, but this test was never to won by Aussies.
Moreover if the Racial Abuse verdict goes against bhajji which was never ever a controvery, then team India has no reason to be in Australia.
Ricky has his integrity shud never been doubted, wat a crap. Every1 has seen his integrity wen he had done that unsuccessful confident appeal gainst dhoni.
Moreover there were 5 umpires against the Indians, fifth 1 being Ponting.
RE:give it back to Aussies
by on Jan 06, 2008 03:06 PM Permalink
i believe that the aussie's r the cheater's. they r not at all thinking that cricket is an Gentleman's game. they r playing for money only. and the umpire's decision is rediculous . i think we ahve to raise an talk that by cheating game they don't get any thing. And the aussie team must be baned for further matches including one day's and test matches. they r big "Cheaters". The main Cheater "hero" is Pointing and Symonds...
This can't be Human Error,Since it is 7 times' Before few years match was fixed by Captains, all of you know,but the area found SEALED by official authorities putting tight controls. So Bookies has now started fixing with Umpires, so no players can be involved,& no cricket Board can be envolved,sxcept to get their share! SteveBucknor,MarkBenson &Bruce Oxenford,three musketear's MAY HV FIXED DIRECTLY WITH BOOKIES!! Who will lose/Win,Collection can be Shared.?? It is known "Sathy Buddhi Natthi",at the end of Carrier one should take chance to play last trick viz.for Sleve,(WHO IS 60years age).Has used his last trick,nodoubthe may also shared benefit to his counter parts -two Umpaire. He is not only SURE,But Confident Notting can happen to him,Man decides WHAT CAN BE RESULT ON HIS DEEDS? Maximum He will be ask to go. Which He has already Decided.We can only Wish him Good Luck for his old age? BUT HE WILL NOT BE ABALE TO ENJOY HIS LIFE! As CONSCIOUS will not allow him PEACE of Mind. I can always request Bookies to ask 3 Masketers to reverse the deal in NEXT two games. Criecket game is Pais Feco TamashaDekho!!
The same story repeats about the indian team " They are the best chokkers ......" The defeat of the Indian team was helped by the Gracious desisions of Mr Buckner. What about the tail enders who gifted their wickets to the Australian Part time spinners ...........ITS A SHAME ...........". I would have not criticized the tail enders if they had fialed to quality seam bowling ............but failing against spinners is a cardinal sin .........."
Miss deepika Padukone has distracted Yuraj FROM CRICKET and thats sure .and he is not looking best against the best side in test cricket.
RE:Mr Jaffer , Yuraj and Miss Deepika
by sameer bhagwat on Jan 06, 2008 02:45 PM Permalink
BEst side in Test cricket? u must b joking... they r worst... they just remind me of the phirangs in the film "LAGAAN"... well we will show them their place some time or later
RE:Mr Jaffer , Yuraj and Miss Deepika
by Rakesh Narayan on Jan 06, 2008 02:58 PM Permalink
Remember in LAGAAN, Bhuvan won the game because the umpires were neutral. Too bad real life is veen more depressing than that.
Congratulations to Australia for teaming up with Bucknor & Benson and cheatingly winning the match. Ponting, Symonds (Twice), Hussey (2nd Innings) were clearly out. In India's batting, Dravid & Ganguly were clearly not out. On top of that, the Aussies, the MAsters of cheating & sledging, cry like babies when they are given their own dose. Suddenly, Symonds is called a monkey - Is calling someone a monkey, Racism???? As a child, I was called a monkey, dog, donkey, etc. by friends - It was never racism. Because Australia practices racism, they find it racist. Guilt feelings???? I feel the ICC should start being tough with them. Ponting is no judge to give anyone out. What was the third umpire doing? Anyway, that third umpire was useless - remember, the Symonds stumping appeals (2 times). I would rather ask Team India to boycott the tour, if Harbhajan is penalised. Mcgrath had asked Sarwan in West Indies, how Lara was in bed. Sarwan asked Mcgrath to ask his wife. That made Mcgrath angry. The different sets of rules for the Aussies- basically Criminals as their lineage is, is getting clear now. SHAME ON YOU AUSTRALIA - MY 4 YEAR OLD SON IS BETTER BEHAVED AND MORE SPORTING THAN YOU ALL.
RE:CHEATS
by Onlooker on Jan 06, 2008 02:53 PM Permalink
I am sure your friends would not call some strangers on the street with such name. They know what would happen to them then.
Earlier it was Pakistani team that played with 2 non-playing members in their team on the field. Now it's Ausies who have taken their place. Bad blow to Cricket
RE:KANGAROOS PLAYING WITH 13 men
by lionel dsouza on Jan 06, 2008 02:48 PM Permalink
We should ask the two umpires how much were they paid for giving so many bad decisions against India? Mark Benson and Bucknor raised their fingers very soon on appeals by the Aussies, but when India appealed, they were blind & deaf.
RE:KANGAROOS PLAYING WITH 13 men
by SHEIKH HILAL on Jan 06, 2008 02:47 PM Permalink
AND WHAT ABOUT KUMBLES 10 WICKETS ? WAS THAT FAIR UMPIRING ? SUDHAKAR
BCCI lodges a complaint like a crybaby with ICC. This will be interesting to find out where it goes from there. As a fan I'd like to see- Warnings to Umpires and Ricky Ponting also for aiding the poor umpiring decisions wilfully thus bringing disrepute to the game of cricket. From the team's side unless ICC comes back with a promising reply, like Inzy did back in England, Kumble should boycott the 3rd test completely.
Harbhajan, Saurav, may be the entire Indian team will charged for dissent and bringing disrepute to the game. What about Pontin's appeal for a catch, which he clearly grassed, what about Gilchrist catch taken of the pads and appealing successfully, what about Umpire Benson showing faith to a fielder, who apparently took a grassed catch, and not believing batsman attitude that the catch was doubtful? Allthese matters should be considered as Dissent and appropriate sanction should be imposed. But any body cares?
RE:Dissent! What Dissent?
by on Jan 06, 2008 02:43 PM Permalink
Umpire Benson had to ask Ponting because he had no choice as Steve Bucknor was sleeping at square leg and he had forgotten about third umpire exists for this match
RE:Dissent! What Dissent?
by ganguly dada on Jan 06, 2008 02:41 PM Permalink
hussey also twice given not out in the second innings.i think even mark benson,the english umpire was against the indian team apart from steve bucknor.just citing this example.benson gave hussey not out when playing back to a anil kumble delivery.the hawk eye showed it would have hit the stumps three quarters of the way up.sane benson gave rp singh out when playing well forward.the hawk eye showed the ball hardly clipping the top of the stumps.it was absolutely obvious that the umpires were against india.this was not erronous umpiring,it was a clear case of biased umpiring.the indian media should take this up.all cricketing ties with australia should be put on hold before the guilty are not punished.the australian media is going to favour australia.what can you expect from a country of cheats.and there is no need to say anything abt black bucknor.
RE:Dissent! What Dissent?
by tumpalahiri on Jan 06, 2008 02:45 PM Permalink
yes bucknor belongs to the same creed as symonds....monkey bhajji was right in calling symonds a monkey...he should have bucknor also a monkey
RE:RE:Indian lying culture comes to haunt..
by Rakesh Narayan on Jan 06, 2008 02:46 PM Permalink
And umpires trust Ponting because , oh yes he molested someone in a Kolkatta night club in 1998... If only someone in the club had the guts to whoop his ass so he never set foot in our country.
RE:Indian lying culture comes to haunt..
by rajan alakandy on Jan 06, 2008 02:49 PM Permalink
The Umpires are very much afraid of the Ghoras. symond is the son of bucknor. The father always save his kids.
RE:Indian lying culture comes to haunt..
by ganguly dada on Jan 06, 2008 02:57 PM Permalink
abe mf aussie. Why should Clarke be trusted to rule on a potentially match-turning catch when he stayed at the crease on day four after edging a ball to first slip?aussies are convicts.now dont teach us abt indian culture,you convict.
Gavasker is jealous of Ricky, thats why he always abuses him....just wait for one more test match, he will ruin all ur recors Mr. Racial Manohar Gavaskar
RE:Remove gavasker from commentry pannel
by Harish Thakur on Jan 06, 2008 02:58 PM Permalink
why do u say that after all I have found Mr. Gavaskar to be a fair person he does comment on Indians when they are blundering and apart from that the catch that Clarke took and was clearly touched the ground and as per law says if the ball is grounded before the catch is completed a batsman is not out and what has Mr. Gavaskar got to be jealous of Ricky Ponting. Ponting is a cheat so is the whole of the australian team....If indians are penalised for excessive appealing so should be the Australians for the way appealed for a long time
RE:RE:Remove gavasker from commentry pannel
by srinivas kumar on Jan 06, 2008 02:43 PM Permalink
I even dont like Gavaskar Very much. After viewing the Sydney Test you should come to know that Australians Lack Sporting attitude. Almost 10 decisions has gone against us in this Test match. Umpire is giving out on basis of Ricky ponting's Statement. If that is going to be the case Why we need an umpire. Ricky ponting is appealing for a catch by touching the ball on the ground. once Chanderpaul Said Australia can be beaten by any test teams if umpires remain neutral. Gavaskar abusing ponting is totally acceptable. I was a big fan of Australian Cricket team but not anymore.
