If anyone heard the commentary-- one and only Ravi Shastri was boasting about the Mumbai Indians and didnt utter a word about the other team. However, good or bad, at that level he must understand to give his commentary on a neutral note.
RE:One sided Commentary
by Biswajit Ghoshal on Apr 24, 2008 10:36 AM Permalink
Shastriji did like that as otherwise, Raj Thakrey would have given him a thrashing. Thank God that Ravi did not say that "Mumbai has won".
RE:It is a shame that some people are insulting National Icon Tendulkar
by suresh kumar on Apr 24, 2008 10:36 AM Permalink
Mr.Aryan, I appreciate your gesture towards Sachin Tendulkar, even i agree his contribution to Indian Cricket is great. If some stupid people say something bad about him, it will not matter, they say in kannada if dog's bark will indraloka get disturbed.
This Cricketer is a Hero of Sorts, He Played 3 World Cups, Even Captained his Team in One of the World Cup, He Also Played Another Sport for His Country, He is Often Considered The Rennaisance Man of His Team and that Cricketer is Not Jhonty Rhodes.
harbhajan bowled only 2 overs and did not give bowling to jayasurya at all.yaa agree...dew factor......but harbhajan and jayasurya would have bowled much better
RE:sachin
by on Apr 24, 2008 10:39 AM Permalink
What do u mean by a match winner???... Hitting 6s and 4s towards the end of the innings and scoring over 7 runs per over and chasing a target??? Surely it is match winning. (i am a big fan of yuvraj and uthappa) If a batsman does well in the first innings and set a huge target... or Creating a strong platform in the second innings... isn't it a match winning effort?...Isn't he a match winner????????? Yea!! to some extend... Right??!! So Sachin is not a good(??)match winner... right...Chasing the target is match winning... am i correct????So dravid and ponting are match winners, right??... (i am a fan of dravid also but dravid is not greater than sachin...PLZ dont compare sachin with the present indian cricketers...)THEN, PLZ check this statistics... not the latest... (sportsstar).
CHASING TARGET PLAYER
Match
RUN &nb sp; HS
AVG
1 00
50 Sachin
101 &nbs p; 4397
134
58.62< BR> 13
23 Dravid &n bsp; 72
2124
109* &nb sp; 49.39
2 &nbs p; 19 Ponting
77
2670 &n bsp; 124*
53.40
4
17
IN THE FINALS PLAYER
Match
RUN &nb sp; HS
AVG
1 00
50 Sachin
47 ; 1954
141
46.52 4
11 Dravid &nbs p; 30
943
103*
37.72
1 < BR>5 Ponting
41
1406
140*
40.17
2
6
IN SERIES WON PLAYER
Match
RUN
HS
AVG
100< BR> 50 Sachin
127 & nbsp; 5548
186*
51.37
19
26 Dravid &nbs p; 76
2645
153* ; 42.66
2
22 Ponting
177
7245 &nb sp; 145
47.98 18
45
OF COURSE, SACHIN HAD PLAYED MORE MATCHES...Thats why i am highlighting THE AVERAGE... He played more matches and he
RE:RE:sachin
by simply som on Apr 24, 2008 10:31 AM Permalink
can super succes define what he means by match winner???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????sachin has got highest man of match award that is fact no body here can change this.
RE:c grade team
by Mahesh Dave on Apr 24, 2008 10:34 AM Permalink
If it is a weak team, low score match, sachin is a hero. But if the score is high, if the rival is tough, sachin shivers and crumbles. All crucial matches in last 4 years sachin hardly played against strong teams. Sachin is like elephant now. A liability in the team. Unfortunately Tandla's "Blind worshiper" didnt understand his selfishness..
