RE:Dravid
by sun bangalore on Sep 25, 2007 04:20 PM Permalink
Hey you deepak, Never pass bad comments. Think of those moments where he rescued india from defeat. He is a gentlemen, What sort of comments you expect from him. He represented India and will always cheer for india. If you want to know where he is, try and get him. Good luck
RE:Dravid
by Sanjay acharya on Sep 25, 2007 04:28 PM Permalink
IT IS BECAUSE OF DRAVID WE COULD SEE INDIA WIN. I THINK.HE DID A WISE DECISION NOT ONLY BY OPTING OUT OF TWENTY TWENTY BUT ALSO MADE GANGULY AND SACHIN TO OPT OUT
RE:RE:RE:Dravid
by Jawad Munshi on Sep 25, 2007 05:04 PM Permalink
gentlemen...... when Sourav was captain, he alays said no to opening in test... when he was .... he just did that....9after seeing the pitch against pak) just to make name and fame...... and mind u u reisgned caue he wants to make more records (runs) Sourav never resigned and never cared for records but only for team
RE:Dravid
by Ifear paceman on Sep 25, 2007 05:09 PM Permalink
amazing stuff Saurav never cared for records... ha..ha...ha....read following.
Ganguly%u2019s own performance in World Cup 2003 matches which all his supporters are claiming as tall.
Against major oppositions where opening partnership was spoiled by Ganguly
8 v New Zealand at Paarl 9 v Aus at Centurion 19 v Eng at Durban 0 v Pak at 48 v SL at Johannesburg 3 v NZ at Centurion 24 v Aus at Johannesburg
And now look Tiger against minnows
112 not out v Nam atPietermaritzburg 107 not out v Ken at Cape Town 111 not out v Ken at Durban 24 v Zim at Harare
Not out against minnows to swell averages but mediocre batting performance. Now go and find out why we went to Finals who scored there? Keniya went to semis as England and New Zealand surrendered matches and points as protest against Zimbabwe regime for their safety. And those were supposed to be played there in Zimbabwe.
and as England and New Zealand surrendered their matches in protest against Zim regime Kenya came to semis.
RE:Dravid
by Birju on Sep 25, 2007 07:53 PM Permalink
In most of those matches the bowlers won it for us and Sachin too scored most of the runs against weaker opponents only, barring Pakistan Match where Sachin Scored 98, his other 100s were against Kenya & Namibia only. Against Australia Great Sachin Scored 36 & 5 & Great Dravid scored 1 in 23 balls & 47 (that too when the match was already lost) . Please check records before posting partisan comments!
RE:Dravid
by Ifear paceman on Sep 26, 2007 10:08 AM Permalink
how foolish somebody can be? 36 v Aus higest in innings 50 against England second highest after Dravid 62 97 vs Sri Lanka 98 against Pak all fergotten even low scores are within top 3 in inning under seaming day nighters...
Ganguly is worser than rookies of 20-20 like Sharma Yusuf Uthappa and Gambhir all capable of replacing him in ODI.
India also won the WCC Championship Down Under in 1985, which was another landmark achievement after 1983 world cup. All the then cricket playing nations participated in that championship.
RE:Dhoni's fate
by GRT Guru on Sep 25, 2007 04:27 PM Permalink
I agree, he is not playing well. But dont say he is lost his form, because he is playing away from the sub continent in a bouncy pitches. Once he comes back to Sub continent he will again become a terror. Out sub continent we can not expect anything from him, Yuvraj is the better player and he should be captain of India. But it seems he has some attitude problem, thats why Dhoni was preferred ahead of Yuvraj, but now Yuvraj performed so well, so it is real pressure for selectors as well as Dhoni.
It is almost like we are loosing the cup. the luck favours us very much and the concept of Pak. never wins India in the world join hands together to make India win the CUP.
RE:Dravid
by debmalya mitra on Sep 25, 2007 02:52 PM Permalink
i guess currently he's consulting chandu borde and sharad pawar for what comments he can make..maybe he's given a letter to pawar and gone into hiding..maybe tomorrow pawar will disclose it to the press..
RE:Dravid
by Anand on Sep 25, 2007 02:59 PM Permalink
I assume you jackasses are talking about the comments from past captains? Where is Tendulkar's comments? Can you leave dravid out of this?
RE:Dravid
by Santa Singh on Sep 25, 2007 03:04 PM Permalink
I think your TV set is not in working condition or you have not paid your cable guy's bill. Yesterday evening if somebody who was talking the most about the team's victory was Sachin. Pls keep watching news channels.
RE:Dravid
by debmalya mitra on Sep 25, 2007 03:03 PM Permalink
ru dravid's relative in some way?if you call others jackass just cuz they want to see dravid's comments then by same logic arent u one urself by asking for tendulkar's comments? besides tendulkar has already given his comments to ndtv.. if u want go to the site and read it..
RE:Dravid
by sanjay on Sep 25, 2007 05:03 PM Permalink
most probably you people are watching NDTV nothing else.... that journo has to ask then he will give comment....
Did any body come accross any reaction from Dravid ??????? Amazing silence !!! Though dravid's timing was superb in quitting captaincy or else he would have been automatically replaced by Dhoni and would have lost the moments of undue glory he enjoyed last week.
it was a misqued stroke from richards which brought india back in game otherwise boss we lost wo wi 5-0 immidiately after wc83,so kapil dev is not a hero definetley not fo me
RE:who won you world cup1983-definetely not kapil dev
by debmalya mitra on Sep 25, 2007 02:55 PM Permalink
who cares about u dude? india won the cup in 83 and kaip was the captain who inspired the team to do so.. that's the bottom line..who cares about weird comments from equally weird people? that too after 24 years?
RE:who won you world cup1983-definetely not kapil dev
by mukund ram on Sep 25, 2007 02:49 PM Permalink
u moron idiot 175 from 126 balls when we were 17/5 kapil was the hero.that catch.............
RE:Major triumph
by Prakash S on Sep 25, 2007 02:24 PM Permalink
hey abhishek... dont jump too much yaar... its a 60 over side match, i mean the 1983 world cup.. dont make comments if u know anything abt that. mayb u were not born at that time. now u hv internet, right. atleast just look into the net before commenting like this. ...ha ha ha ha
