If the management thinking about the up comming world cup and better performace of Indian team then they have to send back other players along with Irfan who are not performing well since long time.
yes, this good Decision. but BCCI already give more chances to their favorit batsmens to find form. this type of decisions may taken against to them also. don't partiality.
Absolutely not. When you chose a particular set of 16 players for three tests, no player should be sent home unless something drastic like injury etc. happens. Just see the situation: A player is selected in test team; he has not played a single test and his performance has thus remained untested; but he is told that your form is bad, go back. If any player is to be sent back on the basis of form, he should be amongst those who had played and miserably failed in both the innnings, not Irfan.
My opinion on sending back Irfan Pathan is right, since he has been taken and counted as a bowler. First of all I want to bring to notice that he has been unnecessarily promoted in the higher order in batting. He was successful and that has brought change in his attitude. It is real when he is bowling we could not find the Irfan of the earlier days. His line and length is lost and his bowling has become normal. He has to keep it in mind that he is a bowler and not a batsman. He has to regain his form and killer instinct by playing domestic cricket. I pray aimighty that he will definitely regain his form and earlier fame. No doubt he is shaping up well as Batsman, but he has been included in the team as an allrounder. Let us pray for his success and come back.
sending him (pathan) is correct, but selectors should sack first wasteful person of Indian Cricket (Sachin Tendulkar). Pathan regain confidence with palying in domestic cricket
